International The U.K wants to ban Donald Trump for saying they're trying to disguise their massive Muslim problem

Donald Trump's statements about what's happening in the U.K and Germany is...

  • Absolutely true!

  • Completely false!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Is there precedence for a President to charge admission to speak?

Canada trailblazed the way. Charging a fee for appearances is how Trudeau manage to pay for all his premium hair-care products. :p

Government respond to Donald Trump visit Petitions

HM Government believes the President of the United States should be extended the full courtesy of a State Visit. We look forward to welcoming President Trump once dates and arrangements are finalised.

HM Government supports this petition.

During her visit to the United States on 27 January 2017, the Prime Minister, on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen, invited President Trump for a State Visit to the UK later this year. The invitation was accepted. This invitation reflects the importance of the relationship between the United States of America and the United Kingdom. At this stage, final dates have not yet been agreed for the State Visit.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/178844?reveal_response=yes#response-threshold


Oh you mean signing dumb petitions is actually meaningless? Well I am SHOCKED.

It's not meaningless if it provide endless entertainment. I'm looking forward to more hilarity in that Parliament debate on Jan 20. :cool:
 
Last edited:
Theresa May 'looking forward' to Trump state visit

_93903415_mediaitem93903414.jpg

Theresa May has said she looks forward to welcoming Donald Trump to the UK later this year after discussing his planned state visit on the phone.

Last month's invitation, coming so soon after the US President took office, has proved highly controversial.

Speaker John Bercow has said Mr Trump should not address Parliament during the trip in light of the row over his travel ban and comments about women.

And 1.8 million people have signed a petition against the state visit.

The petition, saying that the visit should be downgraded, will be debated by MPs next week alongside one backing the visit.

The government said it recognised the "strong views" expressed but looked forward to welcoming the US president once details have been arranged.

Mrs May spoke to the US president about the trip as part of their "regular engagement", Downing Street said.

"They discussed a range of issues, including trade and security and also discussed the president's upcoming state visit to the UK," a spokesman said.

"The prime minister said she looks forward to welcoming him later this year."

'Embarrassment'

The invitation was issued during Prime Minister Theresa May's talks with the US president in Washington last month.

The government has rejected calls for the visit to be put on hold or scaled back in light of the controversy surrounding the first month of the Trump presidency.

More than 1.8 million people signed a petition claiming the visit would cause the Queen "embarrassment" while a counter petition calling for the visit to go ahead attracted more than 309,000 signatures.

Both petitions will be debated by the House of Commons on 20 February.

The government responds to all petitions on its website if they are signed by more than 10,000 people, and a similar response has been issued in support of the one calling for the state visit to go ahead.

Published on the petitions website, they say the government believes Mr Trump "should be extended the full courtesy of a state visit", adding: "This invitation reflects the importance of the relationship between the United States of America and the United Kingdom.

"At this stage, final dates have not yet been agreed for the state visit."

'Closest ally'

Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon rejected suggestions that the government was out of step with public opinion over the issue.

"I think the government has a duty obviously to have good relations with the US, probably our closest ally and most important economic trading partner," he told Sam Walker on BBC Radio 5 live Daily.

"It is equally important in a democracy that you accept the results of a democracy. President Trump has been elected now by the US and we work with him."

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-38967075
 
‘I Am Ashamed’ vs. ‘Get Over It’:
U.K. Parliament Debates President Trump's Visit

By STEVEN ERLANGER | FEB. 20, 2017



LONDON — With thousands of people demonstrating against President Trump outside Parliament, British lawmakers on Monday debated whether to deny him a formal state visit because — in the eyes of nearly two million Britons in an online petition — it would “cause embarrassment to Her Majesty the queen.”

The debate included the kind of political showmanship and heated language that members of Parliament often do well, with dueling lawmakers invoking Mr. Trump’s impetuousness, his strategic importance to Britain or even his willingness to misrepresent the weather during his inauguration as reasons to cancel or go ahead with the visit.

“The intellectual capacity of the president is protozoan,” said Paul Flynn, an opposition Labour lawmaker who led the argument against a state visit.

In making his case, Mr. Flynn quoted a journalist’s remarks about the disgrace of “pimping out the queen for Donald Trump” — a remark that the Conservative legislator Jacob Rees-Mogg condemned as unworthy, even as a quotation.

Mr. Trump would hardly be the first contentious leader to be honored with a state visit. The queen, acting as always on the recommendation of the government, has in the past received President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, the Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and President Mobutu Sese Seko, the former leader of Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of Congo. After a recent visit with President Xi Jinping of China, she was caught on camera speaking of how “very rude” the Chinese leader had been.

“A queen who has been asked over the decades to host tyrants such as Presidents Mobutu of Zaire and Ceausescu of Romania is going to take a brash billionaire from New York effortlessly in her stride,” William Hague, a former foreign secretary, wrote in The Daily Telegraph.

Still, the prospect of Mr. Trump’s visit has stirred great passion in Britain. The online petition, backed by 1.8 million people, does not call for Mr. Trump to be barred from Britain altogether, only that his visit be a political one, without the involvement of Queen Elizabeth II.

Another online petition, signed by more than 300,000 people, called for the state visit to take place. Petitions with more than 100,000 signatures are eligible for parliamentary debate, and any vote would not be binding. The government of Prime Minister Theresa May has been firm in saying that the invitation to Mr. Trump for a full state visit this year will not be withdrawn.

In Parliament, Mr. Flynn cited the need to keep public trust in politicians and noted that no president had ever been invited for a state visit in his first year in office. He also accused Mr. Trump of acting “like a petulant child” and said the queen should not be seen as approving either his actions or his attitudes toward women and Muslims.

But a Conservative legislator, Nigel Evans, said that Mr. Trump was the president of a great ally of Britain and that the critics should “get over it.”

Mr. Trump was fairly elected, he said, adding, “I do respect that he stood on a platform on which he is now delivering.”

Alex Salmond, a legislator from the Scottish National Party, argued that the invitation should be rescinded because members should not confuse respect for the United States with a personal invitation to Mr. Trump.

Traditionally, American presidents must wait several years before getting a state visit, and many do not get one at all.

Mrs. May, after Britain’s vote in June to leave the European Union, was eager to cement good relations with the new American president, and she arranged a rapid visit to Washington. During the visit, she conveyed the invitation, which Mr. Trump accepted.

Leaving the European Union could lock Britain out of the bloc’s single market, a free-trade zone, as well as the customs union, which eliminates tariffs and customs checks. So Mrs. May has seemed eager to shore up her country’s relations with the United States as a counterbalance.

During the debate, a Labour legislator, David Lammy, spoke of Mr. Trump’s attitudes and asked why Britain should “abandon all its principles” and invite him, “because this country is so desperate for a trade deal that we would throw all our own history out the window?”

He said: “We didn’t do this for Kennedy. We didn’t do this for Truman. We didn’t do this for Reagan. But for this man, after seven days, we say, ‘Please come and we will lay on everything because we are so desperate for your company?’” He added, “I am ashamed that it has come to this.”

But James Cartlidge, a Conservative, said that if Britain canceled the visit, “there will be smiles all around in the Kremlin,” which wants to “divide the West.”

And another Conservative, Simon Burns, said that it was important to be “a candid friend” able to influence Mr. Trump and the United States, particularly so given Britain’s plan to leave the European Union.

Various opinion polls indicate that a small majority of Britons support the state visit. But there are also concerns that it would be met with large protests, comparable to 2003, when President George W. Bush made a state visit and many came out to protest the Iraq war.

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, supports the petition to disinvite Mr. Trump because of the president’s “ban on people from seven Muslim-majority countries” and his decision to block refugees from entering the United States.

“In those circumstances, we shouldn’t be rolling out the red carpet,” Mr. Khan said on Sunday.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/world/europe/britain-trump-state-visit.html
 
Last edited:
London mayor calls for cancellation of President Trump visit to UK
By Brandon Carter - 06/05/17

khansadiq_getty.jpg

London Mayor Sadiq Khan is calling on the British government to cancel a state visit from President Trump after Trump criticized his response to this weekend’s terror attacks in London.

“I don’t think we should roll out the red carpet to the president of the USA in the circumstances where his policies go against everything we stand for,” Khan said in an interview with Britain’s Channel 4 News.

“When you have a special relationship it is no different from when you have got a close mate. You stand with them in times of adversity but you call them out when they are wrong. There are many things about which Donald Trump is wrong.”

Khan has previously called for Trump to be denied a state visit in Britain. He pointed to Trump’s executive order barring refugees and people from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the U.S. as his reason, calling the order “cruel.”

“In those circumstances, we shouldn't be rolling out the red carpet," he said.

http://thehill.com/policy/internati...s-for-cancellation-of-trump-state-visit-to-uk
 
Last edited:
I would like to cancel Sadiq Khan. He is a jihadi using political correctness as a figleaf and anesthesia to keep the West from waking up to the clear and present danger of islam.
 
I would like to cancel Sadiq Khan. He is a jihadi

You are spectacularly high on the retard scale.

I think right wingers are struggling to deal with the reality that a muslim is more civically minded and dignified than the POTUS by a country mile.
 
You are spectacularly high on the retard scale.

I think right wingers are struggling to deal with the reality that a muslim is more civically minded and dignified than the POTUS by a country mile.
I think Khizr Khan already made that clear.
 
You are spectacularly high on the retard scale.

I think right wingers are struggling to deal with the reality that a muslim is more civically minded and dignified than the POTUS by a country mile.

You are spectacularly high on the ignorance scale.

Trump is being realistic about the problem and Sadiq Con is being a scumbag. islam is not a religion of peace and if Sadiq Khan is claiming that these violent acts have nothing to do with islam and that there is not a problem then he is a liar, completely deluded, or a hypocrite. And if he is a hypocrite then he is a priority for true believing muslims to kill.

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah"

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."
 
Someone should tell Khan that visits from Presidents are part & parcel of living in a big city.
 
The UK wants to talk shit as if the US weren't paying the lion's share of the defense budget in Europe.
1dlz8a.jpg
 
Orange already sat down with muslim leaders who tell this muslim pleb when to jump. Visiting a vassal would be a waste of time and money.
 
I would like to cancel Sadiq Khan. He is a jihadi using political correctness as a figleaf and anesthesia to keep the West from waking up to the clear and present danger of islam.

<{jackyeah}>
 
You are spectacularly high on the ignorance scale.

Trump is being realistic about the problem and Sadiq Con is being a scumbag. islam is not a religion of peace and if Sadiq Khan is claiming that these violent acts have nothing to do with islam and that there is not a problem then he is a liar, completely deluded, or a hypocrite. And if he is a hypocrite then he is a priority for true believing muslims to kill.

Again, Sadiq Khan has more dignity, honesty, civic mindedness, knowledge and credibility than Trump, and that can't really be disputed based on their track record.
 
The mayor stated that the attackers did not act in his name.
Of course they didn't.
They acted in Allah's name.
 
You are spectacularly high on the retard scale.

I think right wingers are struggling to deal with the reality that a muslim is more civically minded and dignified than the POTUS by a country mile.
It's got very little to do with the fact that he's a muslim. He's an apologist at best who doesn't acknowledge the huge problem the UK and particularly London has with muslims.

At best.
 
London mayor calls for cancellation of President Trump visit to UK
By Brandon Carter - 06/05/17

khansadiq_getty.jpg

London Mayor Sadiq Khan is calling on the British government to cancel a state visit from President Trump after Trump criticized his response to this weekend’s terror attacks in London.

“I don’t think we should roll out the red carpet to the president of the USA in the circumstances where his policies go against everything we stand for,” Khan said in an interview with Britain’s Channel 4 News.

“When you have a special relationship it is no different from when you have got a close mate. You stand with them in times of adversity but you call them out when they are wrong. There are many things about which Donald Trump is wrong.”

Khan has previously called for Trump to be denied a state visit in Britain. He pointed to Trump’s executive order barring refugees and people from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the U.S. as his reason, calling the order “cruel.”

“In those circumstances, we shouldn't be rolling out the red carpet," he said.

http://thehill.com/policy/internati...s-for-cancellation-of-trump-state-visit-to-uk
Not surprised. This Muslim cunt wants more Muslims in Britain and more terrorist attacks. We are talking about a guy that called moderate muslims uncle toms. And terrorist attacks are just part and parcel of living in a big city right ? His agenda is beyond transparent. This is such insanity. How brits don't see right thought him is beyond me.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top