- Joined
- Aug 11, 2004
- Messages
- 14,190
- Reaction score
- 651
Then the crying will be heard when people move out, schools go to hell the tax money goes with the people getting out.
good. more areas relying on the government the better.
Then the crying will be heard when people move out, schools go to hell the tax money goes with the people getting out.
Don't bother. What's the demographic like in rural stl? Heavily subsidized? That doesn't good at all, imo.
If it worked, then it probably shows that a homogenous society is key regardless of economic standings.No, no, not rural STL. I'm talking like 100 miles NE of STL. Former coal country. Like 95% white. Still quote poor, but rural poor as opposed to urban poor. I'm guessing, now that I am typing this, that population density is a huge determinant in how effective the policy is.
https://www.cbpp.org/housing/the-fu...to-increase-efficiencies-for-housing-vouchers
This was cited to, but I don't have excerpts
http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/americas-rental-housing
Aren't Baltimore's public schools some of the most funded in the nation? I get what you're saying, but that doesn't really apply here. You could take a bunch of these ghetto kids and plop them down in the best schools in the country and they will still fail out because they don't give a shit. They need people at HOME making an investment in their education, not the city/state.You could avoid this most likely if you changed the formula for public school funding.
If it wasn't based on local property taxes these things might not happen.
The current school funding formula came about as a reaction to school integration.
If school funding was done on a statewide level so all public schools had equal funding there wouldn't be as much of an outcry for this type of thing.
It will also speed up gentrification of areas private owned/rented by low income persons who cannot manage property price increases.
But, overall, this is good. Sure, some may leave the area altogether, but others will stay and others will move to neighboring non-affluent areas and, with proper rent control legislation, diversify property wealth.
I see this as certainly a one step back, but two steps forward type of deal.
But, on a related note, public housing needs to be reformed away from austere policies that devalue the living situations of those in them. Data has shown that building actual modest houses that allow owners to feel a sovereign sense of pride in their properties yields better returns on (slightly higher, to be sure) investment.
If I'm paying more and my kid does without something they should be able to afford to you can fuck yourself.You could avoid this most likely if you changed the formula for public school funding.
If it wasn't based on local property taxes these things might not happen.
The current school funding formula came about as a reaction to school integration.
If school funding was done on a statewide level so all public schools had equal funding there wouldn't be as much of an outcry for this type of thing.
That plan will only drag down the good areas not lift up the poor.
It will kill the property values of the areas they build in, but that's the idea.
That plan will only drag down the good areas not lift up the poor.
It will kill the property values of the areas they build in, but that's the idea.
Then the crying will be heard when people move out, schools go to hell the tax money goes with the people getting out.
So then just identify the next area where people go and build low income facilities over there, and repeat.
They can't keep running away forever.
I wish they would do that shit out here in SD. It would be great for the lulz if nothing else. I live in a shady area already so I don't give a fug.
I really would love to see the reaction from compassionate liberals though. They should do this in some wealthy LA neighborhoods too. They're racist if they don't do it, in fact.
Oh no.. They are weak and scared. Wanting a first world life is weakness. Ask a 14 year old girl banging a 22 year old black dude, she'll tell ya... Laugh, but that's who we are basically listening to these days.inb4 any white person moving from that area is labeled racist