- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 35,945
- Reaction score
- 4,933
i bet rip and trt's worst nightmare would be a Black atheist male having a mixed race baby that turns out to be gay
That"s racist!!
i bet rip and trt's worst nightmare would be a Black atheist male having a mixed race baby that turns out to be gay
Only liberal men would be happy to be women.I do not know how to think on this. So conservatives shouldn't we be happy that men are now on par with women when it comes to child rights? Don't conservatives feel the system is skewed against men in custody battles ?
What if the pregnant guy kept his johnson and did not grow tits? He could have the baby through c-section.Only liberal men would be happy to be women.
I didn't think we'd be dealing with this one in my lifetime. Seems like some 2100 shit. But I don't really have an argument against it.
You progressives are sometimes a very strange bunch.What if the pregnant guy kept his johnson and did not grow tits? He could have the baby through c-section.
Good thing he's imaginary, or he would slappy the shit out your face for that one.God would not want this.
same for you nutjobsYou progressives are sometimes a very strange bunch.
I'm gonna be laughing at this response all day.Here is the first preview I found rip
The tech was first developed to help infertile women give birth and so far that seems to be what its been used for so if anything its good for women. This guy in the OP is talking about the hypothetical scenario of using it on MtF trannies but so far in practice its been used by women.
Ha ha, good one! LikeIf its good enough for Arnold then....
Good thing he's imaginary, or he would slappy the shit out your face for that one.
The same was said about men when some research indicated the potential use of female bone marrow to fertilize eggs or something like that. Maybe there is cause for concern here but I think its a bit of a stretch.If it becomes reality that men can give birth, then there's going to have to be a serious discussion on whether the continued existence of the female gender is even necessary for us to go further as a species.
What is the problem with something like this? As the OP notes the first time this was used was for a woman who was born without a uterus. If this helps infertile women give birth isn't that a good thing?
Or is it bad because "s-science gone too far!"?