But but but billionaires! waaahhhhhhhh

Laughable, and facile attempt by you. The hyper rich are humans, they're just pieces of shit. Jamie Dimon is certainly a human, and a piece of shit human as well.

Nice try, though, ma'am

They're, by necessary consequence, successful at giving people what they want. What makes them pieces of shit for doing that?
 
No, I call the Nazis a socialist government, because they implemented explicitly socialist policies (ex: nationalizing the entire iron ore industry).

That just proves my point. I said that they had some socialist ideas but anyone that looks at their combined policies and especially how they progressed would know better.

Explain how socialism supports corporate cartels, as that was what their economic policies became when they were in power.
 
That just proves my point. I said that they had some socialist ideas but anyone that looks at their combined policies and especially how they progressed would know better.

Explain how socialism supports corporate cartels, as that was what their economic policies became when they were in power.

Is the implication here that you think they were more of a free-market than a socialist country?
 
I agree.

The only problem is that the Nazis were explicitly socialist, in both name and deed.

Also to correct you from earlier, the Nazis nationalized iron ore and steel Works Industries in 1937. This was years before the War began, and also contradicts your assertion that the Nazis only nationalize Industries during wartime.

Except, they were not explicitly socialist at all. And they nationalized those industries for war build up purposes and during war time (obviously to maximize output). Again, if they were so socialist/socialistic, why did they not abolish and nationalize all private business and property ? Why did they not confiscate and equalize private wealth of German citizens/Germanic persons (of course I am not talking about Jews, Slavs, etc.) if they were such true socialists? Why did they murder and purge communists, socialists, trade unionists, etc. if they were such socialists? Why did they not attempt for solidarity internationally amongst communists and socialists if they were so socialistic ? I could go on and on and on.....
 
Do you want to make a bet whether you can refrain from projecting your own dishonesty on other posters for a month?

I'll make a bet that you can find zero examples of me ever being dishonest. Your own constant character attacks are obviously driven by projection and resentment.
 
There's always a different flavor of socialism dude. The common denominator, however is that they all destroy lives, wealth, and freedom.

Well, I am definitely not condoning in any way National Socialism. They were undeniably a totalitarian, despotic, truly fascistic movement but they were hardly "socialists"/"socialistic" especially in the way, nowadays, socialism is referred to.
 
No, I call the Nazis a socialist government, because they implemented explicitly socialist policies (ex: nationalizing the entire iron ore industry).

So the German people democratically controlled and owned the entire iron ore industry?
 
The people that produced that amount of wealth for society? Enjoy their dick you mean?
Yeah those people. And they didnt magically create wealth for everybody like wizards. Takes workers to make their schemes work.
 
Yeah those people. And they didnt magically create wealth for everybody like wizards. Takes workers to make their schemes work.

Those workers are employed only because the billionaire found a way to give people something they wanted with the capital they had on hand.

Instead of throwing a temper tantrum about people that have wealth because they created wealth, why don't you try to start a business for yourself and see how easy it is to "exploit" workers.
 
Back
Top