- Joined
- Sep 2, 2013
- Messages
- 2,942
- Reaction score
- 2,155
Consistency for the sake of consistency isn't pragmatic, nor is adhering to some acknowledged-artificial line to be mandate on all human capacities.
It makes sense to be able to drive at 16, since motor functions have matured by that point and that's when you become able to work
It makes sense to vote at 18, since intellectual development has matured by that point, and that's when you fly the coop.
Likewise, it makes sense that alcohol and firearms might be restricted until 21 since, despite intellectual and motor function development having mostly filled out, emotional development still has a way to go and doesn't really complete until the late 20s.
There's a really good Missouri Supreme Court case on this topic re why persons under 20 shouldn't be eligible for life without parole since their impulse control isn't anywhere near complete around 18.
Good points except for disagree on voting at 18 since emotional and intellectual development is severely lacking at that point. Should be moved to 25 and removed at 70.