- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
- Messages
- 664
- Reaction score
- 3
u arent a man if u dont use newtons to measure mass and weight
Newtons are the unit of measurement for weight.
Kilograms are the unit of measurement for mass.
u arent a man if u dont use newtons to measure mass and weight
u arent a man if u dont use newtons to measure mass and weight
Butthurt logic.
All haters must be fat.
welp, u said it urself.Yeah, weight is a force. Mass is not. Never seen anyone use Newtons to measure mass, or weight for that matter. Any time people use metric, they use grams/kilos. Of course you could derive mass from weight, but doing it with Newtons requires a unit conversion, unlike if you measured weight with lbf or kgf. So, no, Newtons don't measure mass.
I do not have a degree in physics. I do work in a nuclear power plant. Some small amount of knowledge of physics Is mandatory.
0/10 for not understanding a joke.But 2/10 for at least trying to sound smart.
it was a joke.. im guessing u even KNEW that mass/weight/force are even interchangeable throughout the world.. or did u have to google all this??Newtons are the unit of measurement for weight.
Kilograms are the unit of measurement for mass.
Agreed also, tapping to strikes takes you out of contention immediately.
If you consent to these amendments, I’d be willing to move forward to a vote.
u a physicist?
just curious
newtons measure force, yea? force is... mass x acceleration. maybe they dont measure mass directly, to say they never measure mass EVER is just not telling the whole truth.
its like saying inches dont measure area... square inches do..
im gonna give u the benefit of the doubt and guess u know what u are talking about... why would u go out ur way to say something like that when u knew the information i typed out?
welp, u said it urself.
i just found it odd u would dispute something like that when u knew the full details..
To be fair, he was making a joke and probably wasn't talking about nuclear physics, astrophysics, or objects near the speed of light. On Earth, it's easy to derive mass from weight, which was obviously what he was getting at.Actually the best you can do is say that Newtons are an indication of mass under some circumstances. Setting aside that F=ma isn't strictly true (its actually F=dp/dt, which becomes important at relativistic speeds), it turns out that gravitational mass is the same as inertial mass (why that is true is the point of General Relativity), and acceleration plays no part in that.
Beyond that, the dimensions of Newtons are mass*length/time^2; you'll note that mass is part of that, but not the whole thing. No scientist (especially not a physicist) is going to say mass and force are equivalent. Or put it this way; there's conservation of mass/energy, there's no conservation of force. If you're interested in this sort of thing, I'd strongly recommend Susskind's "The Theoretical Minimum", very readable if you have a bit of calculus, and you'll see why these distinctions are important.
How can you be a real man if a "manlet" could beat your ass?I’m 6’2 205lbs. You know, a real man.
I disagree. I bet khabib could fuck up tons of normal guys who weigh 220 lbs. Why wouldn't mm be able to beat down a regular dude. Say 5'10" 170?MM can’t beat a normal size human being, unless they’re like handicapped or some shit.
Nah man, this isn’t some karate movie where size doesn’t matter. If MM ever saw me in the street, he would get his shit pushed in.I disagree. I bet khabib could fuck up tons of normal guys who weigh 220 lbs. Why wouldn't mm be able to beat down a regular dude. Say 5'10" 170?
Nah man, this isn’t some karate movie where size doesn’t matter. If MM ever saw me in the street, he would get his shit pushed in.
I speak truths
To be fair, he was making a joke and probably wasn't talking about nuclear physics, astrophysics, or objects near the speed of light. On Earth, it's easy to derive mass from weight, which was obviously what he was getting at.
As someone who has done a little physics, it hurt my brain to see the equivalation made as well.