It all depends on when you gain human rights. I think it should be at around 6 months at least but I'm not totally set on that idea. If you don't have human right I guess you can be aborted.
If the fetus can defeat the killing device in armed combat it earns the right to enter society.They need a killing device that’s kill potential is based on the strength of the fetus.
What the fuck does your thread title have to do with the OP?Here is my question. Look at the following chart:
I am curious, from those who support abortion, at what stage, based on the above diagram that you can each go verify as fact for yourselves, is it OK to kill your child?
Would you call the parts below "a car" simply based on it's potential to be one? A fetus is not a 'child' or a 'baby'.
Let the court decide when you have human rights. If you don't have rights then you aren't protected. I have no moral conflicts.
What the fuck does your thread title have to do with the OP?
Any actual news related to this topic that's ongoing, or are you just here to shit the forum up some more?
Also, there's a curious lack of jew blaming in your OP. Please rectify, thanks.
It's ironic that the most staunch pro-life people, those who believe "life" absolutely begins at conception, are usually also strong advocates of an originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
Yet in the America of the Founders, and for decades afterwards, abortion was deemed legal until the point in the pregnancy where movement of the fetus could be felt through the mother's abdomen (usually 15 to 20 weeks).
So I guess you think it's fine for people to murder homeless people too, since you're not willing to take them home and take care of them.
The first abortion laws in America were after 1850 weren't they? I'm not really up on abortion law history.
Yes, it is significantly easier to deal with unwanted kids who can be fostered and adopted than a grown homeless person without much of a future at all.Apples and oranges. Homeless people are adults. The majority are a result of drug use or mental illness. In the United States there is a whole infrastructure to deal with their problem. Yes, the state can provide for a child who is orphaned or removed from the parents for legal reasons, but that is a different story.
Yes, the state can provide for a child who is orphaned or removed from the parents for legal reasons, but that is a different story.
This makes no sense. You either think that it is a living human being and not yet escaped the good old vag. Either this life is special to you or you are okay with killing it. It is human from the beginning. Care or don't care.