Jon never went to jail so take your troll agenda elsewhere, bud.
Not accusations
He was found guilty
I think it time for you to accept that Jones (one of the best) is a steroid cheat.
guiltyDefine 'innocent'
Virtually identical scenarios
It’s a sad thing that the haters won’t look at the actual facts of the matter
In fact haters go as far as to turn on their beloved USADA while not acknowledge that it was an INDEPENDENT arbiter who ruled on both Jones cases
And both times Jon was specifically ruled NOT to be a drug cheat, and not to have intentionally cheated
In fact BOTH times Jon did not have a an amount of banned substance in his body at the threshold of a therapeutic dose
But never let the facts get in the way of hate
Jon is the greatest fighter we’ve ever seen seen compete, and like any brilliant athlete at the top of their field (Brady, HeBRon, Ronaldo) people just want to tear him down
What’s more disgusting is the glee haters take in every misstep he has. It is very very concerning to me.
Maybe Luke Thomas was right all those years ago when he spoke about why he thought the fans would never embrace Jon.
Ban this fool! Suspicious blood reading, fails 2 drug tests and no ethics, plus snitch = loser
Nice art work
Pretty sure USADA admitted Jon was innocent when the cleared him of any wrong doing. This whole witch hunt has taken years off his athletic prime. He is similar to Ali and Vietman.
Let's go ...Jon Jones is the greatest of all time and I'll fight anybody that disagrees.
Because a cheater can’t snitch cheaters to become a hero child!Your two statements offset each other bud.
On one statement you say that he fails a drug test, are you implying you are for a “clean sport”? On the next statement you say he is a “snitch” and use a negative remark implying that you are against Jon passing on information that is valuable to USADA to help clean up the sport.
You simply cannot have it both ways.
So I ask, what is exactly your agenda here?
Or are you just here to be a known fighter bashing troll?
Perhaps you are just being the loser here?
On one statement you say that he fails a drug test, are you implying you are for a “clean sport”? On the next statement you say he is a “snitch” and use a negative remark implying that you are against Jon passing on information that is valuable to USADA to help clean up the sport.