- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 1,542
- Reaction score
- 4,484
But what if he's innocent?
You think it's fair that he has to live with this stigma for years, it has no doubt cost him millions in lost earnings and legal fees already.
Where does it end, and what's to stop a bunch of money-grubbers doing the same, mud sticks, especially when in the public eye, they count on people not wanting the bad exposure and paying to make it go away.
The only way I'd support what you say is if it was illegal to name the accused until a verdict is announced, and even then there should have to be a degree of evidence before the process is allowed to even begin.
For that reason I think we should all be assuming Conor is 100% innocent.
I actually agree with you that there are issues in these situations around what allegations can do but I don’t believe either party deserves it 100% of the doubt here.
Context also matters, if this were a first allegation and out of context with general behaviour it would be less credible.
McGregor does though have a history substantiated assault allegations (including from before he was rich or famous), a documented history of erratic and aggressive behaviour and string of other unproven sexual assault allegations.
There is enough here to indicate a potential pattern of behaviour. Ultimately this woman now has to stand up and testify in court in the face of questioning from the high end lawyers Conor will have. I think it’s fair that her story is taken seriously and that his version of events is heard.