- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 20,587
- Reaction score
- 7,760
Kelvin Gastelum is the same height as Conor, its not a height thing, its his Frame size,
Conor has a light slim build, smallish legs and arms, where as Gastelum is built like a tank, but his frame size is bigger, both the same height but Gastelum is a much bigger dude.
Conor has to bulk up to 185 where as Gastelum cuts to 185.
When I say height, I say it in the sense of reach. People who are taller tend to have more reach because it's proportionate to the rest of your body, as is your frame etc And yes, I realize reach will vary between people. Conor is at a huge reach disadvantage.
Kelvin? What good did his frame exactly do at middleweight? I think it's safe to say Gastelum was trying to strike with his opposition and his reach was a huge impairment at MW throughout his career
In every exchange Kelvin had no other choice but to be the aggressor if he had any hopes of catching his opponent with a punch. The cost was obviously high with the amount of punishment he took.
You never want to be undersized as a striker man
Last edited: