- Joined
- Aug 25, 2023
- Messages
- 1,569
- Reaction score
- 2,131
TDS on full display in this thread.
dear diary, the courts found molestini cheetolini liable for sexually assaulting e jean carroll. donald trump is a legally defined rapist and sex offender. that's a fact. it is not subject to your feelings. there's nothing to refute.
are you insinuating that joe biden is a rapist? you do know thats kinda like making baseless PED and steroid accusations around here towards ufc fighters right? go over to the UFC forum and let us know how that works out for you. i wouldn't be doing this on dubbs if i were you.
and nobody brought up joe biden. i was talking about you defending rapists.
last i checked, joe biden was never found to have sexually assaulted anybody, but if i am mistaken and joe biden actually is a rapist, or was ever legally accused of such activity, then you make sure to attach the docket number in reference so that i will be able to look that up through the courts and know which case you are talking about.
i mean i did hear of that tara reade nothingburger...oh wait that one never did go to court because her lawyers walked out on her for being completely full of shit and she ended up fleeing the country to go swear allegiance to putin. womp womp. is there any others or is that the best material you've got just to try to defend your rapist cult messiah and try to whatabout his terrible crimes away?
defending someone whos being charged with 91 felonies is crazy.
they really do have no bottom.
YOU BROUGHT UP EPSTEIN in a discussion about E Jean Carrol's credibility.
You're right, that's next level 'whataboutism.'
And how many of those courtcases have been falling apart?
And how many has he's been found guilty of, so far?
So you take the "believable" accusations of Trump raping somebody over the multiple videos of Biden molesting uncomfortable children?
Trump's "grab em da pussy!!!"
You Trump cultist are just completely oblivious
Yeah, if he can be found guilty with no evidence....just the one he went on trial for
Honest question - Do you just not know how or when to capitalize words, or are you so stupid you can't figure it out?better a rapist than a bad golfer though right?
i'll tend to side with the side who calls forward a dozen witnesses while they testify on the stand for hours at the risk of perjury over the word of a guy who decides to flee the country to avoid having to show up to confront his accusers and tell his side of the story while under oath.
and good luck trying to convince me, or any jury panel for that matter, that it's everybody else in the room who is lying except for you when you won't even bother to show up to testify in a civil trial and give your side of the story.
and with something as serious as sexual assault, i'm not going to side with the guys who don't even bother to maintain their clients innocence, put on any kind of defense for their client, put forward any evidence or call forward any witnesses, but instead try to shame the victim and try to act like sexual battery should not be a crime because the victim didnt scream loud enough and then imply that she might have even enjoyed it, and she probably even deserved it! who in the fuck do you think you are?
yeah i don't think i'd choose to believe the word of a rapist over everybody else in the room. especially under those circumstances. and especially when we are dealing with a guy who is not allowed to operate a charity service in new york after he stolen from children with cancer. a dude who ran a scam university. a dude who has defrauded everything he has ever came across. and a guy who has an entire city block in new york with a whole mural put up dedicated of over 20,000 of his debunked lies that he told within just 4 years.
now its your turn. tell me why i should ever believe the word of a serial fraudster and rapist who steals from children with cancer, who would rather flee the country and go golfing just to avoid showing up to court and having to tell the truth? the same guy who lied to the faces of every one of his finest supporters and sent many of them to jail and prison due to his stolen election fantasies and fairy tales that he repeated to them everywhere outside of a courtroom while he pardoned the guy who stole their build the wall money instead? the same guy who said that if you plead the fifth youre guilty and only mobsters take the fifth, only to plead the fifth nearly 500 times in a deposition soonafter.
fuck, just give me one good reason why i should trust anything that this guy says, when everything he's ever said has turned out to be bullshit. go ahead, i'm all ears.
in a he said she said civil dispute, i'm gonna take the word of the 12 or so "she said's" over the word of a guy who didn't say anything and didn't deny the allegations at all, and a guy who's defense team who doesn't try to deny the crime but instead tries to suggest that the victim deserved it.
as for your biden molesting fantasies, make the allegations in court. you have multiple videos. go make the case. shit or get off the pot.
"They let you..."
Implies consent.
Its not a coincidence leftists always leave the beginning of the quote out.
Ah yes, the common 'Trump Cultist' accusation, completely falls apart when someone who generally dislikes Trump but calls balls & strikes destroys your viewpoint.
@Hog-train has been in this thread and outright saying that jury verdict is a joke.
Yeah, if he can be found guilty with no evidence....
Honest question - Do you just not know how or when to capitalize words, or are you so stupid you can't figure it out?
I'm not reading all that. Sounds like literal video evidence of child molestation isn't as convincing to you as "believable" hearsay.
Not to mention the rapist never took the stand under oath to refute the rape claims.Well off the top of my head:
-There was the fact that Trump has bragged about grabbing women by the pussy without there consent. So it's not a hard leap for me to conclude he grabbed this woman by the pussy without her consent.
-There was the fact that he lied about having met Carroll, then they produced pictures of him with her.
-There was the fact that he claimed he never fucked her, then immediately confused her with a girl he fucked.
-There's the fact that he's a known liar, which causes everyone except you midgets to conclude he might be lying here.
-There's the entire deposition where he makes zero effort to refute anything and just throws a temper tantrum like a baby.
And that's just the sexual assault he was found liable for. In order for me to address the defamation, I'd end up crashing the servers here with links to 14,000 rage tweets.
---------
But it doesn't matter what I think. It matters what the jury thought. And you can cry about that evidence. You can insist that you don't believe it. But your a liar and one piss-poor debater if your just gonna spam "der was none evidence whatsoeva," over and over again.
You’re a sick fuck"They let you..."
Implies consent.
Its not a coincidence leftists always leave the beginning of the quote out.
Ah yes, the common 'Trump Cultist' accusation, completely falls apart when someone who generally dislikes Trump but calls balls & strikes destroys your viewpoint.
@Hog-train has been in this thread and outright saying that jury verdict is a joke.
Yeah, if he can be found guilty with no evidence....
Honest question - Do you just not know how or when to capitalize words, or are you so stupid you can't figure it out?
And how many of those courtcases have been falling apart?
And how many has he's been found guilty of, so far?
Not to mention the rapist never took the stand under oath to refute the rape claims.
You’re a sick fuck
Let’s take a look at the full transcript.
Donald J. Trump: You know and ...
Unknown: She used to be great. She’s still very beautiful.
Trump: I moved on her, actually. You know, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.
Unknown: Whoa.
Trump: I did try and fuck her. She was married.
Unknown: That’s huge news.
Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.
She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —
I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.
Billy Bush: Sheesh, your girl’s hot as shit. In the purple.
Trump: Whoa! Whoa!
Bush: Yes! The Donald has scored. Whoa, my man!
[Crosstalk]
Trump: Look at you, you are a pussy.
[Crosstalk]
Trump: All right, you and I will walk out.
[Silence]
Trump: Maybe it’s a different one.
Bush: It better not be the publicist. No, it’s, it’s her, it’s —
Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
Bush: Uh, yeah, those legs, all I can see is the legs.
has idrank ever made a post without mashing together a bunch of irrelevant talking points?
He didn’t have to but it can be held against the accused to not take the stand in a civil trial.He didn't have to. There was no evidence.
There is NO woman on the face of this planet that would claim that she was raped but doesn't know what year it happened.
NONE.
did tucker tell you that or did you manage to come up with that thought all by yourself?
what exactly is irrelevant here? i'm talking about orange cosby and his rape and defamation victim, while wondering why so many of you maga trash have reduced yourselves to becoming a rapist apologist just to try to own the libs.
i'm not the one whining about brandon and whatever irrelevant things that people are saying outside of a courtroom that he might have done. brandon doesn't even have any kind of trial for such activity on the dockets, he has no relevance to these rape and defamation cases. his name was never brought up during these trials, and there's plenty of other threads for me to have my daily cry-cry about whatever hunter and the big guy are up to lately, or whatever it is that i want them to be up to.
none of this pathetic chuddery and petty deflection has any relevance at all towards zesto molesto now being ordered by the courts to pay an additional 83.3 million dollars to his rape and defamation victim. you muppets can whatabout all you want, but whatabouts do not work inside of a court of law, and you're not going to be able to whatabout the fraudy rapists crimes away.