Conditioning FAQ v2.0

miaou

barely keeping it together
@Black
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
6,528
Reaction score
0
This thread is meant to provide general info on the conditioning part of the S&C equation. “Conditioning” is about achieving and sustaining the max amount of power output inside the requirements of an athlete’s sport, but in a more general sense, one could define conditioning as “not getting tired easily while doing various shit”. If that’s what you’re looking for, make yourself comfortable and keep on reading.

2en4u49.jpg


Energy Systems

“Energy systems” is literally the different ways the body can use energy substrates to provide energy for muscle force production. Understanding how the different energy systems work and interact with each other to satisfy the different energy demands of the body is fundamental to understanding how to work on your conditioning.


But first, a few words about the energy substrates:

All energy comes from the main substrates: ATP (adenosine triphosphate), PCr (phosphocreatine), glycogen/glucose and fatty acids (hereby referred to as fat). ATP is the only chemical compound that can be used by the muscle fibers as energy to produce force, so basically PCr, glycogen and fat are used to create ATP, which then is used to produce power.

Basic facts about the energy substrates:
  • a very small amount of ATP is stored in the muscle cells and is ready to be used immediately
  • a very small amount of PCr is stored in the muscle cells
  • significant amounts of glycogen are stored in the body (in the muscles and the liver)
  • the body has plenty of fat and them some (some in the muscles and most in the adipose tissue)


And now the energy systems:


The ATP/PCr System - very high power/very short duration

The ATP/PCr system is anaerobic (“aero” means “air”, and “anaero” means “no air”, i.e. it doesn’t use oxygen) and provides energy FAST but can only provide energy for a very short time. Power being the rate of work production, “fast energy” translates to high power production. It uses what little ATP is ready and waiting inside the muscle cell, and it also uses what little PCr is there to create new ATP. When going all out, both those substrates will start getting depleted within 8-10 seconds. It will generally take around 3-5 minutes for phosphocreatine stores to be nearly fully restored, a process which takes place in the mitochondria and utilizes the aerobic energy system (kind of like recharging your cellphone).


The Glycolytic System - high power/limited duration

The glycolytic system is also anaerobic, it provides energy fast and can provide energy for a fairly long but still limited amount of time. It uses glycogen to create new ATP, which is a pretty fast procedure but not quite as fast as PCr to ATP, and it also creates some “byproducts”. Those byproducts are metabolized by the aerobic system, but if the exercise intensity is high the aerobic metabolism can’t keep up with glycolysis and accumulation of byproducts occurs.

The main problem with the glycolytic system duration in high-intensity attempts is not the depletion of substrates, but the accumulation of byproducts (once thought to be lactic acid) that lower the pH of the muscle cells and render them useless (that’s why in the last few meters of a 400m sprint you “stiffen up” and can barely will your legs to move). Some of those byproducts are gradually metabolized in the mitochondria of the muscle cell and the rest enter the blood and are metabolized in other cells, thus the pH of the blood also drops (this process is sometimes referred to as “buffering”). A fair indicator of this procedure is the blood lactate level (Lactate accumulation, proton buffering, and pH change in ischemically exercising muscle) and the process of the blood (and the muscle cells) returning to normal levels can take north of 10 or even 20 minutes if the original lactate accumulation was really high.

The famous “anaerobic threshold” (AT), which you’ve probably heard of before, sometimes interchangeably referred to as “lactate threshold” (LT) or “onset of blood lactate accumulation” (OBLA), is basically roughly the level of continuous effort above which glycolytic byproducts accumulate. Anywhere bellow that threshold you can sustain your activity for a very long time, anywhere above that threshold fatigue will eventually occur (the further above the threshold, the faster the byproducts will accumulate, and thus the faster you will get fatigued). The terms AT, LT and OBLA are not exactly identical, for further information you can start here:
Anaerobic Threshold: The Concept and Methods of Measurement


The Aerobic System - low power/unlimited duration

The aerobic system provides energy slowly but can last for a fucking long time! The aerobic system is all about the mitochondria, which use oxygen to burn fat and glycolytic byproducts, and through many many slow chemical reactions they produce ATP and CO2. No byproducts are produced and the aerobic system can go on and on for hours as the substrates are virtually unlimited. Another thing the mitochondria do is use oxygen to restore the PCr stores and to help avoid/delay the accumulation of glycolytic byproducts that lower the muscle pH (sort of like “aerobic recycling”). This little detail can have significant implications in maintaining a higher energy output, as well as in recovering faster between bouts of higher energy production. It takes a couple of minutes for the aerobic system to “wake up”, that’s why sometimes when you start running the first couple of minutes may feel more tiring until you “find your pace”.

Unlike the anaerobic systems, the aerobic system relies not only on energy substrates but also on oxygen supply. The oxygen pathway is simple: you breathe, oxygen goes into your lungs, it diffuses into your blood, the heart pumps the oxygen-rich blood through the vessels to your limbs and the oxygen is diffused from the local capillaries into your muscle cells and eventually into the mitochondria. The aerobic system can be divided in two components: the central or “oxygen transport system”, comprising of the lungs and the cardiovascular system (the heart, the blood and the blood vessels), and the peripheral or “oxygen uptake/consumption system”, comprising of the muscle capillaries and the aerobic system-related parts of the muscle cells (the number and size of the mitochondria, the myoglobin content and the various aerobic enzymes concentrations). Those two components together determine the VO2max and both components can be limiting factors to maximum aerobic power production.

Barring health-related issues (like chronic lung issues, iron deficiencies, or different forms of anemia), the main limiting factor in the oxygen transport system is the cardiac stroke volume (SV, i.e. the amount of blood your heart pumps with each beat). The most effective type of training to improve your stroke volume seems to be lower-intensity/longer-duration work, because at high intensities, as the heart rate increases, there isn’t enough time between heart beats for the ventricles to full up. Your resting heart rate (RHR) is a rough indication of your SV (generally speaking, the lower your RHR the higher your SV).

The oxygen uptake system can be significantly influenced by both lower-intensity and higher-intensity training (start here for more info). An important difference here is that, while the adaptations of the oxygen transport system can be equally applied to all types of exercise (running, swimming, MMA, etc.), the adaptations of the oxygen uptake system are muscle-specific.


Energy System Interaction

This graph shows the theoretical ATP production over time when exercising at 100% effort:

15ofkib.jpg


But what happens when you are not doing a continuous all-out effort?

Here is the simplified description: At low intensities, the aerobic system burns fat and provides clean but slow energy. As the energy demands rise and the aerobic system alone is too slow to satisfy them, there is an increasing glycolytic system contribution and the aerobic metabolism gradually shifts from burning fat to burning glycolytic byproducts. As the intensity increases, the aerobic system reaches a point (when it crosses the AT) where it can no longer keep up with the glycolytic byproduct accumulation and the pH starts dropping. While the aerobic and glycolytic systems function in a continuum, the ATP/PCr system can be seen as a separate mechanism that provides brief bursts of energy, sort of like pushing the “nitro” button, but then needs some time to recharge.

For more details on energy system interaction, this article is a good place to start: Interaction among Skeletal Muscle Metabolic Energy Systems during Intense Exercise
 
Last edited:
And now, lets move on to the good stuff:


Building your Conditioning

The goal of conditioning training is simple: build up your energy systems so they can supply adequate energy for the type/rate/frequency of power production necessary for optimal performance in your sport. How you are going to reach that goal can be a bit more tricky, with countless training modalities thrown around (LSD, HIIT, threshold training, alactic training, lactacid training, whatever-the-fuck-training, and so on), but there can be some sense to all the madness:


Improving your Aerobic Power Capacity

A strong aerobic system allows for higher power production for a longer time (this obviously holds true for all but the very short-duration activities) as it results in a higher power output before reaching the AT and a higher power output and longer time to fatigue after surpassing it. For this reason, a good “aerobic base” is considered necessary for athletic conditioning development, as it offers the foundation to more effectively train and improve the anaerobic energy systems.

The initial stage of aerobic system development commonly includes large amounts of lower-intensity/longer-duration training, which results in central (increased SV) as well as peripheral (increased capillarity and increased mitochondrial quantity/size/enzymes - mainly in the slow-twitch muscle fibers, as these are the only fibers recruited) adaptations, while the second stage uses increasingly greater amounts of higher-intensity training to cause predominately peripheral adaptations (in both the slow-twitch and the fast-twitch fibers). The initial stage provides the grounds for the second stage to be more effective, because it develops the cardio capacity to provide adequate blood to the harder working muscles and develops the ability of the slow-twitch fibers to better deal with the greater glycolytic byproducts of the second stage.


2ed8d2a.jpg
Swimming is a great choice for general aerobic work due to its incorporating a great amount of muscle mass​


Improving your Glycolytic Power Capacity

Glycolytic power production is dependent on three main factors: the “buffering capacity” (mainly dependent on the aerobic system adaptations, resulting in a higher AT), the capacity of the glycolytic energy system for max energy production (mainly dependent on the quantity and activity of local anaerobic enzymes), and the tolerance of a lowered pH (aka “acidosis tolerance”).

As was already mentioned, the glycolytic system functions in a continuum with the aerobic system. The aerobic adaptations will improve the buffering capacity, the glycolytic power will be improved by training at or above the AT, and the acidosis tolerance will be improved by training above the AT with intensities/durations that will result in high lactate levels. On top of that, targeting maximal glycolytic power involves bouts of short duration and long breaks (wait a few more minutes for more on this).

It is generally believed that, while functioning in the same continuum, there is some degree of an antagonistic relationship between aerobic and glycolytic adaptations. That is to say, high volumes of aerobic training are generally believed to suppress the anaerobic enzymes, while frequent glycolytic training resulting in high lactate levels is generally thought to have the potential to harm overall endurance (maybe via damage on local aerobic adaptations on the slow-twitch fibers and/or via muscle damage and/or via hormone suppression). That is not to say higher-intensity work isn’t effective, as there is a good amount of evidence for its effectiveness. A good rule of thumb is to increase the workload and intensity gradually and to allow for adequate recovery (for muscle repair, glycogen replenishment and hormonal replenishment) between high-intensity sessions stressing the glycolytic system (HISS and HIIT), which is not that much different than what you’re doing with resistance training.


oargirl.jpg
Rowing can be an option for non-specific upper-body conditioning​


Improving the ATP/PCr Power Capacity

The ATP/PCr system duration can improve via a small increase in the substrates (stored ATP and PCr) and it’s power production may be also able to improve ever-so-slightly via a small increase in enzymes. The general potential for improvement in ATP/PCr energy production seems to be fairly limited and the main factors for improving explosive power production is not the energy system itself but rather the architectural adaptations in the working muscles (increased max strength, increased RFD, improved neuromuscular coordination for each particular motor pattern, etc.).

All this doesn’t matter that much, as the type of training you would do to improve the ATP/PCr capacity is the same as the type of training you’re doing to increase the architectural properties: very short bouts of maximal effort with very long rest in-between bouts (to allow for the PCr to be fully “recharged”).


Building your Conditioning from the Ground Up

A very general blueprint for conditioning training progression of an average beginner athlete starting from point zero could look like the following:
  1. a lot of lower-intensity work (ideally, this phase is carried out in developmental stages of young athletes): long-lasting structural adaptations towards a greater SV, local adaptations in the slow-twitch fibers (greater capillarity, more powerful mitochondria)
  2. some lower-intensity + some higher-intensity work (threshold training, or intermittent training slightly above AT): possible adaptations towards maintaining max SV at higher heart rates, local adaptations in the slow-twitch fibers, local adaptations in some faster-twitch fibers
  3. some lower-intensity + some very-high-intensity work: maintaining the previous long-lasting adaptations, building up the ability of the entire local aerobic system component to support all-out anaerobic efforts (both slow and fast-twitch fibers), building up anaerobic power
  • ATP/PCr power production is not directly dependent on the aerobic-glycolytic continuum, other than the fact that a higher aerobic capacity will translate to a faster PCr recharge (which can be rather important for a sport like MMA). ATP/PCr work is more related to the S&P part of the training equation, rather than the conditioning part and it is integrated in the general S&P progression which goes sort of like this: first improve strength, then improve power/speed, repeat.
Keep in mind that, in a tactical sport like MMA, some smaller or greater amount of stimuli for adaptations/maintenance is going to come from actual sport training. You must also keep in mind that, while adaptations in the transport system are general and will fully transfer from one type of activity to another, the adaptations in the local components are generally muscle specific. So while super-intense cycling training that totally kicks your ass might make you a beast of a cycler, it won’t fully translate to MMA. That is why non-sport-specific conditioning is there to supplement the main sport work, rather than replace it.


10wo5nc.jpg
Tennis is another example of a tactical sport where non-sport-specific conditioning is only there to supplement main sport work​
 
Last edited:
Ok, you sort of understood all that. But what exactly are you going to do in training?


Training Modalities

Here is a brief description of the different ways you can work on your energy systems and how you should take your particular sport into consideration in order to program your training:


Low-Intensity Steady State (LISS)

Also referred to as
 
Frequently Asked Questions


Q: I weigh 500 lbs. and I'm 5 feet tall, how do I lose weight?

A: Eat properly (adequate protein/EFA/micro intakes), create a caloric deficit (via eating less and/or burning more through any activity you can safely engage in), do some sort of strength training to retain muscle during weight-loss. For more info, head over to the Diet & Supplement sub-forum.


Q: I've been training and/or doing various sports on and off for years. How do I know if I have a good aerobic base?

A: The aerobic capacity is usually estimated via measuring your VO2max through direct (graded tests with inhaled/exhaled gasses measurements) or indirect (field tests, like the Cooper test) ergometric tests, and comparing that with normative data for your age/gender and sport.

An easier way to get a rough idea of your aerobic capacity is through practical means. For instance, if you can spar/do bag work for multiple rounds at a 50-60% intensity without getting too winded, or if you can run 8km at/under 40 mins without coming to the verge of death, then your aerobic base is decent.

You can get a very rough indication of your aerobic capacity through your resting heart rate (generally the lower your RHR, the higher your stroke volume); athletes with good aerobic capacity tend to have a RHR under 60 bmp (athletes in endurance sports can get lower than 40 bmp). RHR is in no way a precise indication, but if your RHR is 80 then you'd probably benefit from steady-state work.


Q: Does it matter what types of exercises I use for interval training? I've heard some people say that running up hills is the best kind of interval training. Others swear by the prowler and yet others say conditioning ropes are the absolute best.

A: It matters. When it comes to localized adaptations (especially those from higher-intensity work), which muscles are incorporated (and even under which specific motor patterns) is important to get a better carryover to your actual sport.

Keep in mind that exercises can have different effects depending on how you use them (e.g. hill sprints can be used as ATP/PCr work to get stronger/more explosive, but can also be used as HIIT to work on lower-body endurance), and that they can have different effects depending on your deficits (e.g. if your aerobic system is lagging it may become the limiting factor to something like burpees).


Q: How about 'circuit training'? Is it effective to pick a bunch of exercises like lifting light weights, doing kinds of jumps, doing pullups and stuff like that, and just cycle through them continually, as quickly as possible?

A: Circuits can be useful for saving time when training for strength/hypertrophy/local muscular endurance, easing into training after a lay-off, and can even have cardiovascular benefits (look up PHA circuits for more on this). But when it comes to picking a random bunch of exercises and bundling them together into a circuit that feels hard and makes your muscles burn, you need to take a step back and ask yourself: "what are my goals and how is this going to help me achieve them?"


Q: How can I taper to reach optimal condition for my particular event?

A: The specifics of tapering can vary depending on the exact energy demands of your upcoming event. In general, the preparation plan for conditioning goes from high-volume/lower-intensity to lower-volume/higher-intensity while increasing the sport-specificity of your training, just like you would with S&P. The last 1-2 weeks need to have a particularly low volume of work, most of it having to do with your exact event, to allow for a full architectural/neural/metabolic recovery before the event. In a sport like MMA, making weight for a fight can be another thing to take into account.


Q: I've heard conditioning inhibits strength gains. Can I do both conditioning and strength training?

A: Short answer: Doing moderate amounts of LISS on your off days should be fine. When it comes to more intense endurance work, you might want to program it within a larger periodization plan.

Long answer: There is a significant number of studies on concurrent strength/endurance training, but the findings are contradictory: many studies find no inhibition, others do (for more, you can start by reading this). It seems that moderate LISS will not significantly harm any strength gains if done separately from strength training (as in 8 hours separately or more). It also seems ATP/PCr power work can be merged with your S&P programming (as was already explained). Other than that, the safest route might be to periodize your training, doing strength maintenance work when engaging in big amounts of endurance training, and visa versa (when your main goal is max squat gains, including 3 sessions of HIIT per week stressing the lower body might not be the best choice). In other words, use your brain: HIIT is typically like multiple high-rep sets to failure for the muscles involved; you wouldn't incorporate multiple workouts of multiple high-rep sets to failure during your max strength phase, would you?


Q: Fighter X has great conditioning and I've heard he never does any LISS. That means I shouldn't do any either, right?

A: Fighter X might have done long hours of LISS training in his younger formative years (which you might or might not have done), might have a genetic predisposition towards a high aerobic capacity (which you might or might not share), and might be getting an adequate training stimuli through his skills training to maintain his aerobic adaptations (a full-time fighter usually has the work capacity, as well as time availability, to train long hours on a daily basis). The training that works for him might not be optimal for you.


Q: Fighter X has great conditioning and I've heard he never does any HIIT. That means I shouldn't do any either, right?

A: Lets drive this point home: what works for a high-level athlete with different overall training, a different multi-year training history and possibly different genetic predispositions won't necessarily work for you.


Q: I've heard that to get in good condition, I only have to do something called Tabatas. Is that true?

A: Here is Tosa's elegant prose on the subject:
Dr. Izumi Tabata completed a study comparing 6 weeks of steady state training, to 6 weeks of intereval training. All particpants were already high level athletes, and the workouts were done on ergometers (exercise bikes), with at 10 minute warm-up at 50% vo2max. The particpants doing steady state work did 60 minute workouts, at 70% vo2max, pedaling at 70rpm 5 days a week.

The particpants who did the interval work were encourage to complete 7 to 8 sets of 20s work at 170% vo2max, followed by 10s rest. Exercise was terminated if the pedaling dropped below 85 RPM, and if more that 9 sets were completed, intensity was increased by 11w. This was done 4 days a week. One day a week they exercised for 30 minutes at 70% vo2max.

The results were that the particpants who did interval training improved both their aerobic and anaerobic conditioning, while the partipants who did steady state improved only their aerobic conditioning.

As you should be able to see, there's a lot more to "The Tabata Method" than just doing 20s work, 10s rest. You should also be able to see that the study doesn't demonstrate that there's anything particularly special about this training method, rather it demonstrates that in trained athletes, short, intense interval work, accompanied with a moderate amount of steady state work can improve both aerobic and anaerobic conditioning.

In other words, "Tabatas" are a fitness industry buzz word that are not connected to the study in any meaningful way. Instead of doing "tabatas", plan your training based on your present condition and your goals.


Q: I injured my X and it fucking hurts, what should I do?

A: You should go to a doctor (preferably a sports doc) and follow his advice; this is not a place to get an on-line diagnosis. If it's something really minor, or if you've already been diagnosed and treated, people here might be able to share their own experiences with similar injuries and possibly give you some practical advice.


Q: What about stretching, should I do it?

A: Stretching is more of an S&P-related issue as it pertains to the structural/biomechanical aspects of the myoskeletal system. Attaining and maintaining a certain level of flexibility (depending on the needs of your sport) is important for sport performance and injury prevention, and the way to get there is by following a stretching program. This stretching tutorial, including a very handsome long-haired blond shirtless dude(!), was the tutorial linked in the old conditioning FAQ, and this stretching page is another good information source.
 
Last edited:
Think the final question and answer was just a place-holder and should be deleted, right?
 
I like your choice of pictures. Nice work
 
Impresive thread miaou. I hope I'll contribute some interesting links, later, at some point.
Old stickies should be retired imo, so there will be no confusion.
 
New Q/A added:

Q: I've been training and/or doing various sports on and off for years. How do I know if I have a good aerobic base?

A: The aerobic capacity is usually estimated via measuring your VO2max through direct (graded tests with inhaled/exhaled gasses measurements) or indirect (field tests, like the Cooper test) ergometric tests, and comparing that with normative data for your age/gender and sport.

An easier way to get a rough idea of your aerobic capacity is through practical means. For instance, if you can spar/do bag work for multiple rounds at a 50-60% intensity without getting too winded, or if you can run 8km at/under 40 mins without coming to the verge of death, then your aerobic base is decent.

You can get a very rough indication of your aerobic capacity through your resting heart rate (generally the lower your RHR, the higher your stroke volume); athletes with good aerobic capacity tend have a RHR under 60 bmp (athletes in endurance sports can get lower than 40 bmp). RHR is in no way a precise indication, but if your RHR is 80 then you'd probably benefit from steady-state work.
 
Last edited:
Still love this. I was wondering if it would be worth giving a clearer example of some sort of periodized approach to conditioning work. The main text mentions that you will start with more LISS/aerobic base work and move to more anaerobic work, but could this be drawn out more? I think someone (Miaou or Tosa) posted an example plan in Moyy's log.
 
I would like that too JA, as someone with a horrible aerobic base and limited knowledge on the subject it would be nice to have some guidelines on where to start and what to do.
 
Ok, you sort of understood all that. But what exactly are you going to do in training?
Nc7Osd

lgUx

clickthru.cgi

index.htm
 
Still love this. I was wondering if it would be worth giving a clearer example of some sort of periodized approach to conditioning work. The main text mentions that you will start with more LISS/aerobic base work and move to more anaerobic work, but could this be drawn out more? I think someone (Miaou or Tosa) posted an example plan in Moyy's log.

I'm sorry it took me this long to reply to this.

The thing is, an exact plan for adults is more or less a personalized thing and heavily depends on the specific sport, the current goals and training schedule, and the current/future competitive schedule. I don't know if providing a generic plan would make much sense, as the basic guidelines generally describe it.

The outline you read in Moyy's log is probably this one:

S&P periodization in its most basic form would go something like this:

A) Adaptation phase: do a short (usually 4-8 weeks) phase where you start light and aim to gradually build up your work capacity and connective tissue conditioning to handle greater intensity and work volume. During this phase, also focus on "prehab" exercises and corrective work as necessary.
B) Strength phase: a couple of months (could be few or many, depending on your level and competitive schedule if any) of focusing on basic strength gains. Typically, you start with lots of volume and gradually lower volume and increase intensity. For a beginner/intermediate, you could just follow the progression of a classic strength program for a few months.
C) Power phase: several weeks (usually 4-8) of focusing on power work. If possible do 1 or 2 short strength sessions focusing only on the main compounds for strength maintenance without too much volume.
D) Peaking phase: several weeks (4-6) of focusing on main sport work at high intensity. If possible, do a few short S&P training sessions for maintenance.
E) Deload/rest.

A rudimentary conditioning periodization plan is in the conditioning FAQ. Corresponding with the S&P work, the timeframe would go something like this:
A) Also an adaptation phase where you begin with light short jogs (or whatever other type of conditioning work you plan to do) and gradually increase the length and intensity.
B+C) Basic aerobic work, taking the first several weeks to put in the "mileage" (LISS) and at some point gradually increasing intensity (threshold training, HISS, "tempo runs")
D) Muscular endurance work (HIIT) as required for your sport. The more sport-specific the exercises you implement in this phase the better.
E) Deload/rest.


This is a very rudimentary plan to combine strength and conditioning training leading up to a main competitive event (this is not a plan for general long-term GPP development).
 
I would like that too JA, as someone with a horrible aerobic base and limited knowledge on the subject it would be nice to have some guidelines on where to start and what to do.

Building an aerobic base is really very simple (although actually doing it can take some time and commitment).

Depending on your schedule/location/training history/injury history/etc., pick one or several endurance training modalities (i.e. running/swimming/cycling/rowing/etc.) that work for you and start doing them at a light pace.

The main thing for a beginner is to resist the urge of doing too much too soon. When starting out, your first priority should not be working on your aerobic endurance; it should be the connective tissue adaptations that will gradually allow you to gradually be able to work on your aerobic endurance in a safe way (and also, it should be making sure your running/swimming/whatever form is decent). I.e. start out with a couple of short light LISS sessions per week and take a few weeks to increase your volume and frequency (and, eventually, you intensity).

After the initial adaptation phase, it comes down to your actual goals. If, for example, your main goal is strength and the reason you decided to work on your aerobic base is better functionality and overall health, doing two or three 30-45 minute LISS sessions at ~140 bpm on your off days would be fine and shouldn't interfere much with the rest of your training.
 
Back
Top