Other than constantly. At least you haven't run from this one yet.
As we've discussed, the only interactions I can recall ever having with you are those concerning the economics of the ACA, in which you consistently bring up the same silly non-facts (durr hurr, it favored the rich and was paid for by the middle class!) and then disappear when obvious evidence to the contrary is shown, instead of owning your stupidity like a man.
1.) That's because it does affect the Middle Class far more than anyone.
2.) I said it massively benefits corporations. I didn't say it benefits the Rich. Maybe your inability to even understand what I said is the reason you keep losing that argument.
3.) Every single time we've had this discussion you've accused me of "running" after being once again presented with an argument that you can't refute, then disappear from the thread all together. I get that's it's your schtick, but at least be honest.
4.) As for "silly non-facts" that are actual facts that you can't refute, the only real position in regards to the ACA that I've seen you take is that it raised taxes on the rich.
I think I may have hurt your feelings once when you were bitching about how you and your trailer trash wife can't afford healthcare like productive citizens, but other than that, idk.
1.) By reading through this conversation and everyone we've ever had, who looks like thier feelings are hurt?
2.) Do most Middle Class people live in trailers? All you had to do was tell me that destroying your meaningless, empty attempts at virtue signaling on the internet bothered you so badly. I'd not have so completely destroyed every argument you've ever made.
As far as you "trashing" me in this thread, you've been fighting yourself. I told you that I was citing to a Michel de Cuneo quote, that I don't know anything about Columbus journals, and that I accordingly had no desire or ability to dispute your comments on them.
I'm aware of that. You realize you can be having two different conversations about two different things at the same time, right? Or is your massive intellect not capable of handling all that?
Then you kept quoting me, calling me names, for reasons that are still unbeknownst to me. And I have kept engaging just because you're insanely annoying and allowing you to punctuate our exchange with comments about your own delusions of grandeur would frankly be irresponsible to you on a civic level.
But, to answer your question: Dunning-Kruger. You think that you swing a big dick around here because you're too unintelligent, and probably have too fragile an ego, to know differently. And I think you know this, and that is why you have for some reason tried to elongate this exchange, when I deferred to your judgment pages ago. You're at your senior prom, trying to stop to music from shutting off.
Good to see you projecting again. Fall back on that old assumed intellectual superiority thing you've got going for you.