- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 25,680
- Reaction score
- 9,927
These are just facts you're saying.Pan should not have endorsed compulsory racial segregation. That was the wrong thing to do.
Edit: damn, overused
These are just facts you're saying.Pan should not have endorsed compulsory racial segregation. That was the wrong thing to do.
Edit: damn, overused
Why did that singer make an issue of peoples colour? Why does it matter what the colour of the people were at the front of the stage? Maybe I'm missing somthing here, but to me I find the singers actions to be counterproductive.
Seems like that’s it. Naive me when I read the statement by the organisers I expected to see condemnation of the racist directive of the performer.This story doesn't make sense.
The singer tried to move white people to the back and brown people to the front, and since a couple of the white people reacted negatively they are deemed the racist ones?
You should have known better. It's common anytime an accusation of racism is made, 99.99% chance is being made against a while person. Racism against whites us common, and socially accepted. And the few occasions it is actually acknowledged, they have to invent meaningless terms like "reverse racism", as to not imply that racism against whites is indeed racism. It's disgusting, and pretty much the antithesis of what great men/women like MLK fought for, but it's clearly the norm in western society today.Seems like that’s it. Naive me when I read the statement by the organisers I expected to see condemnation of the racist directive of the performer.
Nope. I keep on overestimating society - when will I learn?
I like pan but he likes to take contrarian positions. He instinctively did so here and then seemed to realize this was not the hill to die on yet did not care to concede anythingChrist with a few exceptions a who’s who of the Sherdog’s Salt Fright LOL
And for the record I think @panamaican is a high caliber poster and mod. He is wrong here though.
Why did that singer make an issue of peoples colour? Why does it matter what the colour of the people were at the front of the stage? Maybe I'm missing somthing here, but to me I find the singers actions to be counterproductive.
But the girls prefer the back because of all the toxic masculinity that permeates the front
The guys that prefer the back are just exercising their toxic masculinity in a different way, by taking up space that could be used for girls trying to escape the toxic masulinity.
Step 1: Be white
Step 2: Attend a concert as a volunteer camera person
Step 3: Be told to move to the back because of your race
Step 4: Refuse
Step 5: Be kicked out
Step 6: Be called a racist
Step 7: Be permanently banned from volunteering with said organisation again. Said organisation profusely apologises to the person who targeted you with race-based discrimination and commits to diversity training in the future
Fun times to be white.
I like pan but he likes to take contrarian positions. He instinctively did so here and then seemed to realize this was not the hill to die on yet did not care to concede anything
I see your point, but idiots need checked.Some of you guys bath in this crap. Get mad, go back to your corners and get ready for the next fringe idiot to do something stupid so you can pretend its the norm in your life. If you go looking for idiots and outrage, its pretty easy to find, its up to you how you want to proceed with your select outrage.
SJW and snowflakes are everywhere on every side these days.
Happens to the best of us. But are we all to proud to return and concede?I think he came to a knee-jerk conclusion based on assumption rather than information, it backfired as they often do, and he bailed on the thread because he realised that race-baiting, trolling and shit-stirring (however unintentional it might have been) is not a good look for a neophyte mod.
She obviously has mental issues:
Happens to the best of us. But are we all to proud to return and concede?
it's lame because that's one of my favorite posters going back many years and when I read that I couldn't believe that A: a moderator is in this thread trolling with racism and B: @panamaican would hold such an opinion but like you said, and like others have said, without seeing them show back open a thread kind of shows if they don't want to touch it again. I myself would want to clarify that though, especially when they post in this form as much as they do. You might go through your 6 months without seeing me but I know for a fact that Pan is on here a lot.Fair enough.
I'd say maybe he wandered off halfway through a discussion he'd changed his mind about bothering with (I've done that on occasion) but he's been tagged so often in this thread that that's pretty unlikely.