- Joined
- Apr 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,415
- Reaction score
- 471
I don't care what you believe. It's normal to speculate. What I do take issue with, are news agencies like the WSJ printing a story with nothing to back it up. Literally nothing. Unnamed source who alleges it, with flat out denials by everyone involved. It's ridiculous that this type of journalism is just accepted. This is tabloid shit, nobody would pay any mind to if it was on the cover of some rag at the checkout at a grocery store. WSJ though? This must have attention paid to it now. Those guys are real professionals.
It's all rather pathetic at how low the standards have sunk.
They are reporting on believable allegations against the president, hardly groundbreaking stuff..it would be one thing if these were completely wild allegations but we already know Trump is a serial adulterer and we already know he pays people for their silence. So what isn't believable about this? Yeah, if it was allegations Trump used to run a child sex ring or some shit it would be shitty joiurnalism but that's not the case here.
If a former secret service agent came out tomorrow and said Bill Clinton was getting BJs from another WH intern besides Lewinsky and the press published those allegations you know damn well you wouldn't be crying about journalism standards, so don't be a hypocrite.