- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 15,112
- Reaction score
- 0
@Jack V Savage
I see you online. Stop hiding.
I see you online. Stop hiding.
@Jack V Savage
I see you online. Stop hiding.
Also, adding items if it's an "any one of these" can only raise your chances, though most people interestingly fail to realize that (I wish I could track down the study that I'm thinking of that shows this).
Heh. Not hiding. I'm trying to think about a way to really make sure there is no ambiguity around 3. There's no rush here.
Also, adding items if it's an "any one of these" can only raise your chances, though most people interestingly fail to realize that (I wish I could track down the study that I'm thinking of that shows this).
I'm trying to think about a way to really make sure there is no ambiguity around 3.
@Jack V Savage
Time to man up, Jackie boy....
By the way, I hereby offer you and anyone else a new bet: Jay Inslee will run for president as a Democrat in the 2020 election. Me: for You: against
Sounds good to me.heya HomerThompson, Mr. President,
either way, i win.
if Roe vs Wade isn't overturned, you'll have to insert this into your sig;
12 percent of people who voted for Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries voted for President Trump
that's my ode to Bernie supporters who were basically anarchists and had no actual grasp on policy. all they wanted was someone who would take residence on Pennsylvania avenue and start breaking things.
if Roe vs Wade is overturned, then i get to witness the self destruction of the Republican Party - which is also fine with me.
- IGIT
You want to get more specific on the nature of the deal between Russia and the campaign? How would you react to a general "easing of sanctions," for example?
@Jack V Savage
The delaying/hiding is getting old, fast. Let's finalize this thing.
1.
- Robert Mueller's investigation will not conclude that Trump attempted to offer US policy concessions to Russia in exchange for access to the hacked DNC e-mails.
- Cory Booker will not be the Democratic nominee for president in the 2020 US presidential election.
- The Republicans will hold the Senate in the 2018 election (In the first Senate session of 2019, the Senate Majority Leader will be a Republican).
2. Waiguoren- for @Jack V Savage against
3. When all three of the above conditions are met, or when any one of them fails.
4. AV bet
5. Four years
@Lead , you good with this?
I think @Jack V Savage is clear on what it means. For Jack to win, Mueller must conclude in his final report that Trump himself offered Putin or a known Putin surrogate at least one policy concession in exchange for the database of hacked DNC e-mails. Even if it turns out that a non-Russian actor was the original hacker, Jack wins.I have some trouble with how we call the first thing. I think that one will result in both people claiming victory unless it was clear as day one way or the other.
I think @Jack V Savage is clear on what it means. For Jack to win, Mueller must conclude in his final report that Trump himself offered Putin or a known Putin surrogate at least one policy concession in exchange for the database of hacked DNC e-mails. Even if it turns out that a non-Russian actor was the original hacker, Jack wins.
On the Trump side, a surrogate would count only if Mueller concludes (not postulates) that Trump ordered the surrogate to make the exchange.
How is it unclear? This looks like a stall tactic on your part.I have the same concerns that Lead does. I was hoping you'd offer clearer language, but I'll do it if you don't. Just not a high-priority item for me. So you can do it yourself or you can be patient.
I think @Jack V Savage is clear on what it means. For Jack to win, Mueller must conclude in his final report that Trump himself offered Putin or a known Putin surrogate at least one policy concession in exchange for the database of hacked DNC e-mails. Even if it turns out that a non-Russian actor was the original hacker, Jack wins.
On the Trump side, a surrogate would count only if Mueller concludes (not postulates) that Trump ordered the surrogate to make the exchange.
Are we good on this bet, @Lead?