- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 23,720
- Reaction score
- 16,046
It seems like every thread that I read now has multiple posters referring to fighters (who have never been busted for juicing) as "post-USADA" or making some accusation that their fighting career went downhill after USADA started drug testing the UFC. Isn't this a violation of the fighter bashing rule?
With that said, wouldn't these post-USADA comments be considered "an unsubstantiated accusation of steroids and PEDs" no matter how subtle and indirect the post is framed?
No Fighter Bashing - Criticism is fine, but flaming is not. Please note that an unsubstantiated accusation of steroids and PEDs is fighter bashing. In regards to female fighters, posting inappropriate, sexual or graphic comments is considered trolling and fighter Bashing. This applies to their relatives and loved ones as well.
With that said, wouldn't these post-USADA comments be considered "an unsubstantiated accusation of steroids and PEDs" no matter how subtle and indirect the post is framed?