Search results for query: *

Now I see Goldie in that response . . . :)

@Osculater your response is showing as a blank post to me . . . :)

Wasn't that a Cane Corso that ended up getting shot dead?

Is any UFC PPV worth $90?

They left way back in 2021. Took them a while to get there.

Thankfully Heller was ruled like it was . . . Since that court ruled the 2A guarantees the right to "keep and bear arms" you're cool with everyone carrying openly then? As spread out as things got and with so few schools, etc. I'm not sure I see how the literacy rate was the same in the West...

I guess it's a good thing Heller looped in the Bowie knife as protected by the 2A. :) I'm sure folks in Colonial America were more educated, but I'd suspect as folks moved west that number dwindled greatly. I think it's safe to say they likely didn't think it violated the 2A because of the...

No one at the time? Or no one until a certain date within the last 100 years? I've always thought the education level of the populace at the time and how often information was available may have played a role in how often something like this may have been challenged. And wouldn't the...

Exactly.

I guess the idea might be to deal with someone harshly to deter others from making the same mistake or being irresponsible.

Many gun control folks look at you like you have 2 heads when you ask them if a law is about protecting people and saving lives or more about controlling access to guns and/or applying restrictions to gun owners. If it's about saving lives, then access to all dangerous items should be limited...

Thanks. :) I guess I just see things as if the investigation determines some form of neglect leads to an unsafe environment due to a child being able to easily access a firearm that there really wouldn't be a need to put this law in place.

I guess I could've posted it in one of the other threads about the conflict. Feel free to add it there if you want.

You've thought this through, haven't you? :)

I might need a lawyer to explain it to me . . . :)

Okay? I'm sure that might be the case for some people. Now what? How does that address my question?

Scorpio. :)

I agree, but why push for safe storage if there's an exception for a child who gains access to the firearm (for self-defense) that's supposed to be secured so they can't?

This story says it has a slim chance of passing, but I thought it was an interesting bill. Especially when you consider the exception listed below: The legislation also creates an exception for the parent if the child uses the firearm in self-defense. Doesn't this defeat the purpose of...