He's not even top 50 all time at HW, the recency bias is insane he has barely fought at HW. As for all time he only has 21 fights, thats not enough fights to be talking about one of the greatest. He is one of the best of the current generation so far, no need to get carried away.
Turki is a casual. Canelo is too smart to fight Crawford because he has little to gain and lots to lose if he loses or goes life and death with a 37 year old welter. I doubt he even fights him for 100m. His legacy is worth more to him.
So he did what Figueroa did 3 years ago? awesome. Neri has some of the worst defense i have ever seen, he just swings haymakers, but apparently beating that mediocre fighter is greatness, ye ok.
Thanks for once again demonstrating how little you understand boxing. You have been watching for decades and still don't understand what separates Benavidez from Mungia. lol. One thing is for sure, Canelo does.
David is much better than Mungia in every aspect of boxing. He went life and death with a 37 year old devchenko and needed a robbery to get past Hogan. Canelo knows this which is why he gave us the classic duck talk in the post fight interview when he was asked about Benavidez. Canelo fan boys...
So despite beating the crap put of every one he has ever fought including world champion calibre guys, he is not fearsome because he has not fought a guy with 10 fights? Ye that is logical obviously/s
Dirrell is a better win at 168 than Saunders and Callum Smith, he was a good fighter a 2 time...
No didn't say that. I said its a quality win. Much worse wins have been regarded much higher for other fighters. Dirrel is a better win at 168 than Callum smith and BJS for example. If Dirrell was losing the fight vs yildrim at the time of the stoppage how was he awarded the win? See you know...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.