Search results for query: *

Sure. She would equally have no place on our society.

Do you believe that she should take a lie detector test now that she’s going to be giving some kind of testimony?

He’s a well-known troll.

Well, the difference here is that one is acceptable evidence, and the other isn’t. If not testimony, which you correctly deem to be faulty, what else is there to determine whether or not Kavanaugh did anything wrong?

*If it happened. So far, we don’t know if a crime happened, much less who was involved. I don’t think that lie detector tests are credible. That’s why they aren’t admissible in court. We also have no idea what questions were asked, so we have no idea if she said something that could have been a...

In the sense that he nominated Kavanaugh, yes, it’s his fault. I agree that he was probably selected because he might be personally helpful in the event that someone decides to come after him with charges, an extremely legitimate issue that someone could take up with Kavanaugh as a jurist. But...

The issue here is again political. The Republicans are afraid of looking “anti-women.” That’s why they aren’t forcing the vote right now.

Said to illustrate my lack of faith in the people of this country anymore. Said to illustrate that this is politically motivated, not about the alleged victim. It’s fine to think that he’s a shitty jurist that would do bad things. Hell, I didn’t prefer him over others, as I think he is a...

Read it. But you shouldn’t punt. They’re your views, so own them.

How many fucking times do I have to answer this question? Yes, it was wrong to obstruct all of Obama’s nominees because they were Obama’s. I’m getting tired of the whataboutism though. Yes, I agree that the GOP can force a vote on Kavanaugh. At this point, they probably should so we can end...

We keep going in fucking circles. If you don’t have any reason to believe her, why would you assume that this claim is worthy of investigation? What’s to stop anyone from saying anything in order to personally hijack any of our governmental processes?

Clearly, this is about as dishonest as I have ever seen the minority party. This is just about obstructionism, and it’s painfully obvious that this is the case. Let’s pretend for a moment that the confirmation is delayed until after the midterms, and the GOP does well. Do you think this will...

Let me ask you this: What has been brought forward to suggest that Ford has a credible case?

She outed herself as the accuser about 2 days after the story broke. She said she felt a need to come forward. The whole thing screams, “My plan was to come forward publicly all along.”

If she’s planning to step forward the whole time, doesn’t that mean she had no plans to remain anonymous? That’s the logical flow there.

Step forward

That she planned to do it all along

How long did it take her to step forward again?

Then why did she send a letter to her Senator, her Representative, and the biggest MSM source in DC? She did that because she wanted them to run with the story. To pretend otherwise is simply nonsensical. After someone mentioned it, she stepped forward, pretending it was reluctantly, and she did...

I honestly don’t believe that she wanted to remain anonymous. She sent letters to Feinstein, her Representative, and the Washington Post. She knew someone would go public, it was just a matter of who and when. As for why she’d do this, you’d have to ask her. The cynical answer is that she’s an...