Search results for query: *

Thank you

Somebody have a link? Looks like Natto is down on Rumble.

Thank you NS

No. And the "dual loyalty" accusation is about as anti-Semitic as it gets.

Up until the Yom Kippur War in October 1973, the United States provided relatively little aid to Israel. Aid really started when Nixon came to the conclusion that if the Israelis were not assured of a military edge over the surrounding combined Arab forces, that Israel could go nuclear in war...

Yeah so? Dems make up 50% of the electorate and younger people don't get out the vote. How does this tie to "Zionist elites"?

The idea of a conspiracy of Zionist elites is about as coo-coo as Marjorie Taylor Greene surmising that Jewish Space Lasers had caused the California Wildfires a few years ago.

Would somebody please tell me when it's my turn to on the space lasers? Zionist elites...coo coo for cocoa puffs.

First, at best, you're talking 56 years. The previous 19 years were on Jordan. The lives of Palestinians improved dramatically between 1967 and 1987. Every university in the West Bank was built under the Israeli military government. Life was getting better but the Palestinians let the PLO...

The Palestinians have shown consistently that they are unable to govern themselves.

The deaths of Palestinian civilians can stop today...Hamas only has to do what everybody deep down knows is right. By the way, I believe you think what you think. You're wrong though. Nobody gives a fuck about Gazans, including Israel.

But it will, because you say, "UN employees" and everybody thinks you're talking about a bunch of blond, blue-eyed Swedes justr trying to make the world a better place. The idea that UNRWA employees are actually Palestinians is just shocking to most people.

There's no way they were going to reject it. They had to order something. Otherwise, the politics would have been horrendous considering the blatant anti-Semitism/anti-Zionism of its parent organization. So, ICJ just split the baby giving about 1/8th to South Africa/Hamas. They basically...

C'mon. Unless they had thrown the case out for lack of jurisdiction, they had to say something...

Your statement: "As you can see, the UN is concerned about the actions of Israel, justifiably so." I don't really think the ICJ thinks there's any basis to South Africa's suit at all. It had to say something for political reasons - this was probably the bare minimum.

Just wanted to see what people had to say after about a week off. This is some spin from Sivert. This was a huge win for Israel. Also, this wasn't a "UN meeting", it was the International Court of Justice.

Thanks!

Why doesn’t Onosato have a top knot?

Thank you!

Awesome. Thank you!