Search results for query: *

That punch was so fast, and the placement was perfect. That's it. It's the sharp shots, not the clubbing ones that are just effective

Yeah, but his last fight he didn't look as good. Therefore he's a white belt. Isn't that the rule of MMA fandom, judge someone by their worst performances only?

Because Anthony Joshua hits really hard. You can't compare the punches of different fighters in different gloves. You'd have to compare the same fighter.

Topuria vs Prime Chad Mendez would have been interesting...

Ortega and Rodriguez went to absolute WAR. Fun fight in multiple disciplines.

Went limp for just a moment there. Crazy recovery though.

Man, I think that might have leveled Max. That was direct on the "Off" button.

Volk's best strategy was to invest and chip away. I could see him making some adjustments and coming back strong, but age and 2 really rough KO in a row. I don't know if he'd even want to come back for that one.

That shot puts almost ANYBODY at 145 or 155 away.

Round Official Scoring Proposed Scoring Volk Topuria Volk Topuria 1 Both with good performance But Topuria marginally more effective. 9 10 9 10 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 4 - - - - 5 - - - - Final Score - - - - Good god Topuria hits hard. That shot takes out...

Basically, I think that the current scoring system isn't good enough. My proposed scoring system is essentially that a 10-10 round is one that you could "easily give to either fighter", all the way down to a 10-1, where it's a total shutout without a finish (what is currently given as a 10-8...

That would be the opposite of arbintrary. The point is to make the scoring system more marginal. And if you want to remove the impact of individual shitty judges, have more judges as I've mentioned before. 5 or 7 judges, and remove the obvious outlier scores like they do in Diving, gymnastics...

Whittaker victory confirmed. Also, anyone claiming whittaker's chin is cracked. The fact he survived that wheel kick, that chin is holding up.

So a round that you win by the slimmest of margins is worth the same as a round that you won by an absolute landslide? That is ridiculous. Your reasoning seems to be that the JUDGES suck. So punish judging, have more judges and do it similarly to how gymnastics, figure skating and such are...

By your logic, you might as well have just a 1-0 either way for a won round, and 1-1 for a draw. What's the point of 10-9, 10-8 if you don't want proper marginal scoring. If you want to change JUDGING, then punish shitty scoring. Make them lose their license if they clearly have no idea what...

You're probably the first commenter to understand my point.

Round Official Scoring Proposed Scoring Neal Garry Neal Garry 1 9 10 9 10 2 9 10 9 10 3 9 10 8 10 Final Score 27 30 27 30

More that Merab was FAR more effective than Henry. That was just a cherry on top.

In what way? Combine this with open scoring and the scoring laid out in a way that rewards activity and action rather than stalling, and I see no weakness. What's the point of utterly dominating someone, like lets say you think that one fighter was twice as effective as the other but the...

Edited, thank you.