Search results for query: *

I don't think you are right based on the answers others have given me. In the scenario I posed, I think the longest amount of time for any observer is going to be 10 years total. The person traveling will only age let's just say 2 years total (1 there and 1 back). 10 years for the person on...

how did they measure the difference in age between human though? I understand the clock concept though

So I think if you are right you answered my question. Basically, for the person on the ship, you could travel to the nearest star (4-5 years at the speed of light timed by a person on earth) in approx 1 year?

my numbers were somewhat made up because I don't know the true math. I just wanted to use whole numbers for examples. And to my understanding, it has been tested and the theory proved true. They put an atomic clock in motion for some time and compared it to the stationary clock on earth. It...

If there was a big mirror on Alpha Centari and our objective was to beam light towards it and wait on the reflection to beam back, we would expect it to take (8 years using your math) for that beam of light to travel to Alpha and back. That's to the person watching it from earth. Right? So...

We always hear something along the lines of "it would take 5 years at 99% speed of light to reach the nearest star. I don't know the exact math, but let's just say using Einstein's relativity, a person traveling at 99% the speed of light ages 1 year relative to every 5 years for a person on...

The man is up there in age, got a lot of miles. I saw the fight even going into the 3rd round. Jorge defended ok against Gilbert's ground game. I wouldn't call that domination. I thought Jorged look big and quick in the first round.

Classic case of, I did did something to you and now I apologize so you need to forgive me forever. Look, Will Smith opened that door the moment he slapped chris and said "keep my wifes..." blah blah blah So he's got to live with that. Also evident that will smith is a child who never really...

I think both can be true.

I think you are right man. I know Usman has alluded to it a few times too. I don't think he's making it up

No shame in it, but I told somebody before the fight he's starting to look old and weathered. Heck of a championship run for Usman, but age might have caught him a little sooner than some.

jones would have dominated him

yes. Love him or hate him, we love to watch him fight.

Yes he probably will 1) Jon Looked great last night 2) Stipe didn't look intrigued to have to fight Jon...like at all 3) Stipe looks old and weathered. Not knocking that fact of life, just calling it how it appears And you know what...congrats to Jon Man. For somebody who's been through so...

Because he's never truly lost a fight outside of Matt Hamil which he was well on his way to winning if it wasn't for the DQ. Call that a loss I'm not going to argue either away. I don't need to when you look at his resume. Now, some of his wins were very close such as Gus, Reyes, Santos...but he...

best comment yet

kind of why I asked the question about the elusive south!

Yea it would. I mean, every time I've been in the midwest or northeast I do feel out of place. So I imagine if I was going to live somewhere else for a while I would want to congregate towards something that feels like home. But also why I'm keeping it here in little town Georgia.

Ehh, after 1st cousin it's all fair game. jk

Yea I know right, is the most South-central state in America. So it's kind of confusing. But the term "south" I think has its roots in the confederate states and early formation of America. So on a map, the central area of "south" has migrated towards Alabama/Georgia side, and is essentially...