.... I don't know how you quantify outrage, but there's been a lot over the Catholic Church and Penn State sex abuse scandals, so I'm not sure why you've concluded that there was more outrage over Weinstein. It sounds like you're alleging that the media conspired to underreport these issues, but they were widely reported at the time that they occured. Maybe just things that happened at different points in time?
As far as Penn State goes, Sandusky is in prison, Paterno died before trial, and three other penn state officials have since been imprisoned for their role in the coverup. Penn State has now paid over 100$ million due to fines and lawsuits related to the sex-abuse and coverup, and the senior officials who were directly involved were the ones imprisoned. The media was in a frenzy for a month over it - I genuinely don't know how you don't remember that.
And the Catholic Church has been subjected to lawsuits, criminal investigations, and protests in over a dozen countries, and has paid billions in settlements and fines. Multiple Cardinals, Bishops, and Archbishops have resigned or been criminally charged in various countries for either their abuses or their role in covering up the abuses of others. Ratzinger's resignation may have been tied to his inadequate role in addressing the issue. To take one particular region, there was a movie made about the Boston-specific abuses. There are hundreds of articles in news papers and several books that have been written on it. And that's just Boston - there's more for every other similar scandal involving the church. The idea that "the media" has been silent on this is baffling. Maybe you're just looking in the wrong places or not remembering what occurred. Beats me.