Technique I like to think of is a multiplier to your strength, but if at the end the gap is still too big there's no much you can doThey're obviously playing around but it's still a nice reminder about the role that size differences play in the techniques we use.
Technique is meant to offset the natural differences in size, strength and speed but if the physical gap, size, strength or athleticism, is big enough then even technique can't overcome it. I think the clinch parts were interesting because he just can't get good positioning for some standard set ups.
Makes you wonder about the effective end point for a lot of techniques if you're ever facing a true size difference.
Still, knees are knees and throats are throats and cardio is cardio. So I'll take the trained manlet over the out of shape behemoth.
Technique I like to think of is a multiplier to your strength, but if at the end the gap is still too small there's no much you can do
But with much bigger opposition, tactics is your strength. Going head to head with a bigger guy is just asking for trouble and playing right into his game. An old coach of mine used to say, imagine that (as the smaller guy) you're a Civic, and your opponent is a F350, you can't clash head to head or you're gonna get merked. So you gotta take angles so you'll T-Bone him and possibly derail him.
That's was the point, it's a bit of a joke.was that a fight? looked like they were just running at each other