37 Palestinians and counting dead, 1600 injured bc of Israel

No i'm talking about why Israel will not invade the gaza strip or the west bank. They will still us gas bombs and guns from a distance though.

lmao at not invading West Bank. After three Israelis were kidnapped and murdered, IDF entered all the cities to seek for terrorists and Palestinians offered no resistance.

IDF in the center of biggest city in the West Bank:

IBrother%27s_Keeper_Operation_in_Judea_%26_Samaria_%2814234161827%29.jpg


streets of the West Bank capital after IDF raid:

640px-Street_in_Ramallah_after_IDF_raid_during_Operation_Brother%E2%80%99s_Keeper_June_2014_2.jpg


If they were really like nazis, there would be thousands of people dead.
 
Yeah searching for criminals. You're having a really hard job comparing like for like. I show apples and you pull out grapes.

Remember we are speaking in the context of stamping out the Palestinians. So going into search for criminals and going into the west bank to slaughter everyone will elicit different responses.

Try and follow the conversation you're like the drunk in the pub slavering out their point oblivious to the actual thread of the discussion.
 
every nation that starts to recognize jerusalem as Israel jewish capital is basically undoing that though. The US i dont think was ever serious about caring for 1967 border they just did it for diplomatic reason to appease the muslim countries they allied with. You have to give them something i think this is why most of world took that view.

what would the saudis and egyptians and turks tell their people and hardliners if the US just overtly for decades went ISRAEL AND JEWS ABOVE ALL OTHERS.. They have to at least maintain some neutral stance.

Well the situation is certainly moving now and rather quickly.
 
A former Israeli soldier says Israel's troops crossed a "red line" by firing on unarmed protesters in Gaza with sniper rifles.

"We see IDF snipers shooting at unarmed Palestinians when they are 300m away from the fence," Nadav Weiman, who was with an Israeli sniper unit a decade ago, told Sky News.

"That's a huge change from when I was a sniper and I think that this is a red line that I personally thought we were never going to cross," Weiman added.

http://www.businessinsider.com/isra...crossed-red-line-with-gaza-sniper-fire-2018-5

Trump has given the power to Israel to do this.
 
I was highlighting land ownership not population, however looking at that it shouldn't be to hard to understand why the Palestinians were a bit unsettled with the Jewish population growing from 7% to 30% in 30 years and them being offered half the land by the UN.

Bunch of fucking racist xenophobes.

Maybe they haven't undergone unconscious bias training to see how great diversity is.
 
Last edited:
It's not the Palestinian Right that want the 67 borders, it's United Nations resolution 242 that even America voted for at the time that states it.

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/palestine/ch3.pdf <<< there is the actual document.

I'll agree with that, I suspect that with Fatah and more moderate Palestinians there will be a little wiggle room with some settlements allowed to stay. With Hamas and other hardline right wing factions there is no wiggle room.
 
Bunch of fucking racist xenophobes.

Maybe they haven't undergo unconscious bias training to see how great diversity is.
There are parallels with some modern immigrants like Muslims to Europe, like both being insular immigrants who keep to their own community. But beyond that its very different. The Zionist came to purchase land and displace the Palestinians en mass. It got so bad it lead to a revolt and the British tried to ban the practice but God's chosen people don't take orders from the goy so they continued doing it anyway. Muslims immigrants aren't taking the best land and leaving thousands of Europeans homeless, they're shoved into ghettos.

The Chinese upper class who purchase some of the most coveted real estate in countries like Canada and Australia, raising the housing prices significantly and pricing out less wealthy natives from certain housing markets, is a closer parallel but even then its not the same as large scale eviction.
 
oh ya, you're totally right, I was just throwing it out there.... there are many exclave/enclave (even second order ones, I believe all third order ones are now gone) that seem to work in other parts of the world, albeit perhaps not as contested as this region (although I imagine the Bangladesh/India situation was outta hand for awhile)

There's too many settlers out there already IMO, not sure how they are going to deal w/ that short of maybe a two state solution and either exclaves or letting people freely choose which nation if they are in a contested area....

the Spanish city of Llivia in France is one example of this, or old West Berlin, Northwest Angle in Canada is a US area, etc...

There will be blood no matter what path they choose, I guess a big factor in choosing will be the one that spills the least.
 
It's not the border though is it? Don't comment on issues you have little understanding of. You just confuse the issue for people who want to learn wtf is going on.

I can tell who have advanced as a civilization and who has not.

Since day 1 the strong always conquer the weak.

They done...
 
In the late 30s this might have read:
If European Jews keeps up their bullshit, there’s going to be no choice but to 100% expel them from the region. Germany isn’t going anywhere and the European Jews need to get that through their heads.

Signed Hitler

Wrong.
 
Well that much is obvious, like I said Palestine is not viable at this point. And really that was likely the Israeli plan all along; stall out the two state solution so as to build enough settlements into Palestinian territory such that there can't be a viable, sovereign Palestinian state. So they basically got away with their colonial project, good for them but it hasn't made them very popular and they're going to have to live with that.

Palestin “not being viable” is a good thing.
 
oh ya, you're totally right, I was just throwing it out there.... there are many exclave/enclave (even second order ones, I believe all third order ones are now gone) that seem to work in other parts of the world, albeit perhaps not as contested as this region (although I imagine the Bangladesh/India situation was outta hand for awhile)

There's too many settlers out there already IMO, not sure how they are going to deal w/ that short of maybe a two state solution and either exclaves or letting people freely choose which nation if they are in a contested area....

the Spanish city of Llivia in France is one example of this, or old West Berlin, Northwest Angle in Canada is a US area, etc...

India saved Bangladesh when they proclaimed independence from Pakistan. They let them invade and wreck Pakistani army because Bangladeshi were being slaughtered. Indians captured almost one third of the whole Pakistani army.
 
Back
Top