- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 12,949
- Reaction score
- 7,478
How so?
I like the fact that you are trying to think about it analytically, but there are SO many factors to consider, that simply using height is just not enough.
How so?
What’s your argument then?It doesn't matter how many "5'4 athletic guys" I know. That would be anecdotal evidence and irrelevant.
What’s your argument then?
I used average height of the division and within two inches.
You can’t do average weight because the average American male is fat and/or horribly overweight. Frame is much more important.
Height does’t relate to frame? Height is a component of frame. Again, it’s based on averages like any statistic.But height doesn't relate to frame. Take a guy like JJ Watt who is the same height as Alex Gustafson but almost twice as thick. Or a guy like James Vick who is the same height as Stipe