Arrests for offensive Facebook and Twitter posts soar in London

[Hard To Tell]

Some Tory MP sent out this tweet and people are demanding he be sacked

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-44818546

Meanwhile a Muslim Labour MP tweeted this

and she's just been promoted to the role of shadow equalities minister. But the worst part is millions of people still vote for these grooming gang supporting scumbags.

 

[Soul Crusher]

I wonder how many progressive libs from London sit there with seething rage and think I should be arrested for posting the truth?

How do you not feel so ashamed, weak, pitiful and embarrassed for buying into such a pathetic ideology?

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

everyone knows liberals hate free speech

That's why I read these threads, the sharp, insightful, thoughtful analysis

 

[Soul Crusher]

All the progressive libs in the war room from other countries that spam the report button dream of having something like this.

Report to police button...

 

[Soul Crusher]

That's why I read these threads, the sharp, insightful, thoughtful analysis

They want to ban and silence anyone the doesn't buy into the progressive liberal ideology. Stop acting like that's not what's happening here.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

They want to ban and silence anyone the doesn't buy into the progressive liberal ideology. Stop acting like that's not what's happening here.

"They".
Like I said, insightful. Blanket statements are the solid foundation any good line of reasoning is built on.

 

[Soul Crusher]

"They".
Like I said, insightful. Blanket statements are the solid foundation any good line of reasoning is built on.

Progressive libs have a hive mind. This has already been well established. They all think the same way in every country infected with progressive liberalism. The progressive liberal ideology is manufactured for the drones.

 

[MayhemMonkey]

. We are going to see something big happen soon.

you dont half slaver some amount of shit.... what are we going to see happen soon?

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Progressive libs have a hive mind. This has already been well established. They all think the same way in every country infected with progressive liberalism. The progressive liberal ideology is manufactured for the drones.

You've convinced me with the power of rhetoric.

Btw you need to pepper your posts with more "progressive"s. Maybe replace all verbs and nouns.

Progressive libs progressive a hive progressive. This progressive already been well established. They all progressive the same way in every progressive infected with progressive liberalism. The progressive liberal ideology is progressive for the progressive.

 

[MayhemMonkey]

When I say "fuck Islam", can you Brits like the post and get arrested or you gotta actually say "fuck Islam" yourself?

we can say fuck islam all we want...... hate speech is about inciting hatred and/or violence. Saying "fuck islam" does neither.... for all they know we could be talking about a guy called "islam" that we dont like lol

 

[MayhemMonkey]

I don't know. It does not have to be something violent. MLK and the Civil Rights Marches in the 60s was something. The Anti Vietnam Marches were something. I don't think anything large violent will happen as long as people feel like they still have a political voice but if Breixit does not go through and people feel that their vote and political voice no longer matters I could definitely see something violent.

did your friends that work for UKIP tell you that?

 

[Soul Crusher]

You've convinced me with the power of rhetoric.

Btw you need to pepper your posts with more "progressive"s. Maybe replace all verbs and nouns.

Progressive libs progressive a hive progressive. This progressive already been well established. They all progressive the same way in every progressive infected with progressive liberalism. The progressive liberal ideology is progressive for the progressive.

Progressive insanity on full display here.

Progressive liberals in every country infected with progress believe guns should be banned and confiscated, want resistance to the progressive liberal ideology silenced and eliminated, think diversity is a strength and want certain countries flooded with immigrants from the third world, think multiculturalism is a strength and that all cultures belong in the West and Europe, love and protect Islam, love and support LGBT insanity and think women are oppressed by white males.

 

[ryan3434]

Is it jail time for the offenders or just a fine. Like Ontarios money transferring human 'rights' trIbunal?

Sent to jail with real criminals for tweeting means words would be disgusting . I mean to a lesser extent so is taking peoples money for hurting feelings

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Also, in terms of genuinely fake information, particularly in the area of group libel, there's a good chance that the internet age will force American courts to make some concessions on the First Amendment as well to salvage our democracy.

If our choices are:

A: Keep free speech and expression for all

Or

B: Maintain what the American left calls Democracy.

I'll pick free speech every time.

 

[Hard To Tell]

Many leading left-wing MP's, journalists, pundits, commentators and right-on celebrities have spent the past two years crying and demanding that the Brexit vote be ignored. Thousands of self proclaimed 'liberal progressives' also took to the streets to show that they wanted the democratic process to be overturned because it didn't go the way they wanted.

They have also been full of non stop insults and seem to think that if you're working class and/or not part of their metropolitan elite clique then you're too stupid and uneducated to be trusted with the vote.

These same people then act like you're some crackpot, paranoid conspiracy theorist when you dare point out that their way of thinking and brand of politics are a threat to our freedoms and basic principles of democracy.

Guardian reading lefty - "How dare you accuse me of not believing in democracy, free speech or liberty. I just think that your vote shouldn't count if you don't vote the way I tell you to and that you shouldn't be allowed to express opinions I don't like. That's all."

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Progressive insanity on full display here.

Progressive liberals blahblahblah

Yadda yadda, wonk wonk.

 

[Soul Crusher]

Yadda yadda, wonk wonk.

A window into the complex progressive mind.

 

[voxom]

I'll just copy and paste my previous post for all of your political illiterates, foregoing the fact that liberals created free speech itself, while conservatives (at that time monarchists: see the Tories in the UK) opposed it at every corner of Western history.


Here is the First Amendment jurisprudential makeup of the Supreme Court, laid out by ideology. The percentage is the percentage of cases in which the Justice sides with the individual's right to free speech.

Sotomayor (1st most liberal) - 67%
Ginsburgh (2nd most liberal) - 69.4% - protects free speech rights most often
Breyer (3rd most liberal) - 55.8%
Kagan (4th most liberal) - 68%

Kennedy (5th most conservative) - 46%
Roberts (4th most conservative) - 50%
Scalia (3rd most conservative - 30.5% - protects free speech rights least often
Alito (2nd most conservative) - 39%
Thomas (1st most conservative) - 32.2%

http://epstein.wustl.edu/research/justicesdata.html


Likewise, you can go back through all of American jurisprudence on free speech (1A claims by citizens really didn't become a thing until the 1920s) and see it has always been the liberals (Brandeis, Brennan, Thurgood Marshall) who have protected free speech, and it has always been the conservatives (Harlan, Burger, McReynolds) who have opposed it.

Reality. Become acquainted with it.

why are all the current protesters who are against free speech today all liberals?

why are all the people in favor of hate speech laws liberals?

 

[Lord Coke]

did your friends that work for UKIP tell you that?

See my response to Fogie

 

[Throwin Bombs]

That's completely different, because (a) it's against an individual, not a class and (b) it's accurate based on reasonable definitions.

Trump is:
(1) dangerous, based on reasonable definition (he's impulsive, he uses violent rhetoric, he holds the most powerful position in the world); and
(2) a fascist, based on reasonable definition (I've posted about the definitional components of "fascism" as a political ideology many times, and Trump checks like 11 out of the 15 boxes at bare minimum - people fail to appreciate that not all fascists are "literally Hitler").

Oh look this goof is back,what happened someone kicked you out of the hole you were hiding in?