I think this is a good thing. Its wrong that men are just ruined if some woman decides to accuse him of something.
No she's crazy
Manspreading is literally rape.
What if your daughter is a slut who falsely accuse innocent people?
3rd wave feminism can suck my dick & so their protests against retarded topics like Wage gap, Mansplaining, Manspreading, Patriarchy, Rape culture. Did I miss anything?
Edit: Yeah forgot about Toxic Masculinity.
There is no such thing as "smart vigilante justice". That never existed and never will. The very implication of vigilante justice means a subjective application of extrajudicial punishment without oversight or regulation. Widespread vigilante justice means the state institutions had failed to maintain order in society, which would make such an environment quite volatile (i.e. parts of Mexico). You got exposed as an idiot and continues to demonstrate ignorance with every new post. I love the fact that you try to say I'm trying to save face. You're simply embarrassing yourself at this point arguing for a regressive practice. Unfortunately, rule of law and duo process must be constantly defended from blood thirsty mobs such as yourself.
I'll let it go when you stop making it so easy to beat your silly notions into the ground.
You're really sticking it to them.
I would think twice before sticking into them. Might catch herpes. Nah I would rather leave those cat ladies alone.
How would an independent investigator be much different? The claim will be scrutinized all the same.
I'm not against that, but I don't see how it doesn't run into similar resistance from the #BelieveAllSurvivors folks.
You really don't think an independent investigator would have a different agenda than an attorney hired by the accused? I am all for experts scrutinizing the claim, as a young person suffering the devastating consequences of false accusation is horrifying, but subjecting every accuser to the grilling of a hired attorney is just going to make accusers be less likely to come forward. I think allowing independent investigators to interview the accuser, the accused, and then to come up with their opinion of what occurred, knowing then that they will need to their investigation and opinions stand up to any holes that the accused's attorney could possibly find, would be a much more sane option.
What if your son gets accused of sexual assault?
"Believe all victims" may come to an end on college campus.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...s-college-sexual-assaults-20181114-story.html
My opinion, listen to both sides, there's 2 sides to every story. Weigh the evidence. The accused should be able to know who is accusing them. And the accused have a right to question their accusers. Good for Betsy DeVos and good for the Trump administration.
Discuss
How would you know?Falsely accused?
I see the difference in agenda, and I think it would be totally fair.
What I'm saying, is that I don't see there being a difference in response by the #Metoo folks to this, and it will still be looked at as a cruel and unnecessary hurdle for victims. They are against pretty much anything resembling due process. Listen, believe, condemn, is their motto.
You have no way of knowing that for sure. In fact, that's largely based on misleading studies performed by ideologues where they used a very loose definition of sexual assault to give them an overestimate of the prevalence of sexual assault on college campuses. This is what happens when postmodernists are allowed to run wild at universities.
That's a poor excuse for crippling the defense for the 2-10% falsely accused.
How would you know?
If your son was accused, do you think he should have a right to face the accuser and the charges?
There are always going to be irrational people, and you obviously can't build rational policy around their irrational objections. The policy obviously can't be the accuser said it, we believe it, that's that, but on the flip side forcing the accused (and we are talking about 18-22 year old college students) to be grilled by a professional attorney, hired to attempt to undermine the accuser's claims in real time, is not much more rational.