- Joined
- Jun 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,075
- Reaction score
- 0
Khabib has basically no striking defense
Do you realize this is outright fictitious, right?
http://www.fightmetric.com/fighter-stats
Khabib has basically no striking defense
The reason Khabib doesn't absorb a lot of strikes is because he spend virtually all his time in the clinch and on the ground out top pounding people out.
Generally the strikes people are throwing against him are bombs trying to catch him as he moves to clinch or shoot and yes, he is good at avoiding those.
Which does matter, but doesn't tell you anything about his ability to deal with an opponent who doesn't let him close the distance. Being on top all the time is a great strategy,
but it doesn't tell you much about his actual striking defensive ability.
This observation is irrelevant to the portion of the fight where he has to display striking defense, which is what the stats capture. The rounds don't start with Khabib in dominant position. He could spend 4m55s of a each round on top, but still absorb 100% of the shots that are thrown at him in the first 5s.
So you are admitting he has good striking defense since those are the strikes he has to avoid, because, as you said, he rarely absorbs any while grappling because he's in dominant positions.
Again, this is an objection that would be relevant only if the stat had a small sample size (like saying he has 100% defense against takedowns, but all his opponents combined attempted only one takedown), or if the rounds started with Khabib on top. Since those are not the case and the sample size is large, the stats are telling us exactly the story they are supposed to say.
As for the fact that you want to know how he deals with someone who doesn't let him close the distance, well, I guess we'll have to go with the fact that he could close the distance to anyone he's faced so far.
As explained, it tells us exactly about that.
The stats don't tell the whole story here. The reason Khabib doesn't absorb a lot of strikes is because he spend virtually all his time in the clinch and on the ground out top pounding people out. Generally the strikes people are throwing against him are bombs trying to catch him as he moves to clinch or shoot and yes, he is good at avoiding those. Which does matter, but doesn't tell you anything about his ability to deal with an opponent who doesn't let him close the distance. Being on top all the time is a great strategy, but it doesn't tell you much about his actual striking defensive ability.
The stats don't tell the whole story here. The reason Khabib doesn't absorb a lot of strikes is because he spend virtually all his time in the clinch and on the ground out top pounding people out. Generally the strikes people are throwing against him are bombs trying to catch him as he moves to clinch or shoot and yes, he is good at avoiding those. Which does matter, but doesn't tell you anything about his ability to deal with an opponent who doesn't let him close the distance. Being on top all the time is a great strategy, but it doesn't tell you much about his actual striking defensive ability.
It's a duplication of the Ronda effect, where people talked themselves so much into believing the only way to win was a big knockout that they would only throw full power shots, which made it much easier for her to close range.