British woman sells her virginity to a Hollywood star for $1 million and felt "empowered"

Her career as a whore is off to an astonishingly good start. She seems under-qualified though.
 
I'm just wondering who the "premier league footballer" was...

At 26, she's about 12 years too old for Adam Johnson.

th
 
Has anyone considered the possibility she may just be lying for attention?
 
^ this.

And anyone that believes in "virginity testing" = lol
 
Maybe thst picture is very unflattering....
 
Nooob said:
Pics is on the link, rather not post here because it's NSFW.

screenshot_20180421-150153-jpg.468286
Click to expand...
Virgin Vagina privilege, ladies and gentlemen....really, if she was a regular hooker $250 an Hour at most.


Dat 5head tho.
 
I'm not paying for sex, but if I were to I'd spend my money on someone that's more likely to know what she's doing in bed. But to each his own.
 
I'm assuming the people who bid are rich enough that their bid might not affect their finances at all but I find it pretty odd someone spending that amount of money on this. The listed people seem successful and possibly attractive (athlete and actor) so why shell out that amount of money for sex?
 
Madmick said:
This is applying the feminist narrative of "empowerment" to an act of the sex trade; she has literally made a commodity out of her body for a sexual purpose. This steps across a line that stripping, for example, doesn't cross. It wades much closer to porn, and right now feminists are trying to construe porn as a predatory industry that destroys the lives of young women in service of lecherous men. Watch Rashida Jones's Hot Girls Wanted to understand what I'm talking about.

It also assigns agency to her despite that these men have all the wealth. Have you guys not paid attention to the rhetoric of #metoo, and the overarching political theory to it? The notion is that there is no truly valid (unspoken) contract that a woman can sign that subjects her to the sexual enjoyment of wealthy or powerful men in service of her interests or ambitions. If we accept that this woman is "empowered" by enriching herself via selling her body to a wealth Hollywood actor, then it complicates the argument that the young actresses who were eager to do sex scenes in "student films" with James Franco, for example, were oblivious to the bartering power that gaining his attraction or company might benefit them towards their ambitions.

They are not as hopelessly naive as they pretend to be, nor did they signal victimization at the time, despite being asked this literally during the process, repeatedly, which informs us that they didn't actually feel victimized until a later date...seizing on the opportunity of a hashtag movement to channel. perhaps, a resentment to the fact that their careers went nowhere as a result of their gamble, and that they realized they'd been played for their unwise investment.

In this girl's case, she signed an actual contract with the German company, apparently, but this will unnerve feminists chary to a slippery slope.

It restores the sanity of common sense that women often use their "feminine wilds" to advance their own interests, and this isn't a matter of "oppression", but of calculation. After all, the presumption is that we're all doing the best we can with the resources we have to try to rise up the ladder.

This threatens theories inherent to Marxism, Critical Race Theory, and Feminism. Do not underestimate its significance.
Click to expand...

The rise of the empowered-victim has to be one of the most unsustainable cultural tropes of this new century.
 
I dont understand this at all. These guys are so fucking wealthy, they could literally walk into any bar in any city in any country in the world, and leave with the hottest bird there - without spending $1million. She isn't even that fit, and having sex with virgins is massively over-rated - its boring as fuck. Sex is much better with girls who have had sex a few times before, the same way the majority of women will prefer a man who 'knows what hes doing' over a 17yr old college kid.

And it's amazing how receiving a lot of money can empower someone, isn't it. I'd say the vast majority of these #metoo fuckwits would happily drop all talk of the 'assault' in question if a sizeable amount f money was offered to 'help them feel empowered'.
 
Madmick said:
This is applying the feminist narrative of "empowerment" to an act of the sex trade; she has literally made a commodity out of her body for a sexual purpose. This steps across a line that stripping, for example, doesn't cross. It wades much closer to porn, and right now feminists are trying to construe porn as a predatory industry that destroys the lives of young women in service of lecherous men. Watch Rashida Jones's Hot Girls Wanted to understand what I'm talking about.

It also assigns agency to her despite that these men have all the wealth. Have you guys not paid attention to the rhetoric of #metoo, and the overarching political theory to it? The notion is that there is no truly valid (unspoken) contract that a woman can sign that subjects her to the sexual enjoyment of wealthy or powerful men in service of her interests or ambitions. If we accept that this woman is "empowered" by enriching herself via selling her body to a wealth Hollywood actor, then it complicates the argument that the young actresses who were eager to do sex scenes in "student films" with James Franco, for example, were oblivious to the bartering power that gaining his attraction or company might benefit them towards their ambitions.

They are not as hopelessly naive as they pretend to be, nor did they signal victimization at the time, despite being asked this literally during the process, repeatedly, which informs us that they didn't actually feel victimized until a later date...seizing on the opportunity of a hashtag movement to channel, perhaps, a resentment to the fact that their careers went nowhere as a result of their gamble, and that they realized they'd been played for their unwise investment.

In this girl's case, she signed an actual contract with the German company, apparently, but this will unnerve feminists chary to a slippery slope.

It restores the sanity of common sense that women often use their "feminine wiles" to advance their own interests, and this isn't a matter of "oppression", but of calculation. After all, the presumption is that we're all doing the best we can with the resources we have to try to rise up the ladder.

This threatens theories inherent to Marxism, Critical Race Theory, and Feminism. Do not underestimate its significance.
Click to expand...
Yes, meh.

:D

Much ado about nothing.
 
GOATER said:
Virgin Vagina privilege, ladies and gentlemen....really, if she was a regular hooker $250 an Hour at most.


Dat 5head tho.
Click to expand...

Not gonna lie; I've paid a lot less for a lot better.

(When you look like three miles of rough road, you lose any moral objection to hiring hookers pretty quickly:(:oops:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PEB
Did Gina Carano destroy her acting career or was there not one to begin with for her?
7 8 9
Replies
163
Views
7K
Jack V Savage
Jack V Savage
Rygu
Social 90 Year old woman fired from her volunteering position of 60 years at MS nonprofit for not understanding pronouns.
11 12 13
Replies
257
Views
9K
HereticBD
HereticBD

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,682
Messages
55,434,270
Members
174,775
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty

Share this page

Back
Top