- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 32,797
- Reaction score
- 0
The biggest problem in our country in my opinion.Unfortunately in America everything has become my team vs your team.
The biggest problem in our country in my opinion.Unfortunately in America everything has become my team vs your team.
I asked for case law. I guess we found out who the retard is.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30121
http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-jr-emails-illegal-campaign-2017-7
I love how you run through the whole gamut of excuses for this behavior.
Now show me the case law which shows information is a thing of value. Case. Law.(A)
a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
How about a supreme Court case?I asked for case law. I guess we found out who the retard is.
Now show me the case law which shows information is a thing of value. Case. Law.
Now we get to your saying it's ok as long as you go through a third party. Trump Jr. used a third party. He did not contact the Russian lady directly. You already said as long as you use a third party it's fine, so why are you so bent out of shape? Or maybe you are just a hypocrite.
Sorry no case law. You cited monetary donations. Cite case law on information only. Aren't you smart enough to read and see what those cases were about?How about a supreme Court case?
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2145572/bluman-v-federal-election-comn/
https://www.cov.com/-/media/files/c...n_on_contributions_from_foreign_nationals.pdf
Even if there wasn't case law, it's still a law. That would only mean that most people aren't stupid enough to get caught colluding with foreigners, not that Trump Jr and Kushner are in the right.
Trump Jr didn't use a third party. The person he contacted was a foreigner himself you retard. When they took the meeting, they directly met with a foreigner on behalf of a foreign government. It's hard to pretend to be smart when you don't even know basic facts of the case.
No surprise you can't answer the question.
Shit poster! Shit thread!
still can't answer the question?Tell me liberal friend, when pissgate first broke, there were massive 50 page threads on it where leftists were celebrating with cake and fireworks.
Now, a few months later I make a thread about the developing Congressional investigation about pissgate, and you call it "another rightwing circle jerk". I thought you guys were interested in the Steele dossier and Russia investigation. What happened?
still can't answer the question?
moving the goal post and turning it sideways?
I never gave an opinion on the steel dossier.
My post has nothing to do with my opinion, I called out your shit posting and shit thread!
This thread should be waste land you can't back up shit or answer the question. if the mods were worth a shit you'd be banned or yellowed for not supporting your shit post.
so again what was " very fake"???
Parrot!
still can't answer the question?
moving the goal post and turning it sideways?
I never gave an opinion on the steel dossier.
My post has nothing to do with my opinion, I called out your shit posting and shit thread!
This thread should be waste land you can't back up shit or answer the question. if the mods were worth a shit you'd be banned or yellowed for not supporting your shit post.
so again what was " very fake"???
Parrot!
Hrs trying to be cute by calling CNN fake as a perceived "jab at liberals". He thinks he's clever.
and then used that to get wire taps to spy on their political opponent during an electionEvidently the supposed Russian "Informatsionaya voyna" wasnt good enough so Dems literally had to manufacture fake news.
Thanks for the bump, Edison Carasio. Do you by chance have any opinion on the topic of the thread? While meta-analysis of my thread is sometimes useful, I'm very interested in also hearing your thoughts on the core content. Thanks in advance.
I didn't read the article,
I don't really think there's enough substance
Devin Nunes is beyond compromised. Any direction that he is trying to take the investigation is complete bullshit.Tell me liberal friend, when pissgate first broke, there were massive 50 page threads on it where leftists were celebrating with cake and fireworks.
Now, a few months later I make a thread about the developing Congressional investigation about pissgate, and you call it "another rightwing circle jerk". I thought you guys were interested in the Steele dossier and Russia investigation. What happened?
Or maybe Devin Nunes is a complete hack and is using the committee politically. Maybe.They've turned over 40k pages of docs and will turn over more, and one of the partners has already submitted to questions from the sen. judiciary back in August (Grassley, Feinstein). I'm wondering if they're afoul of something like foreign agent registration, or maybe the committee was trying to get them to reveal clients/sources they didn't want to reveal.
There really isn't much here though. And there isn't much potential for a huge story. Oppo. researchers potentially stepping over the line a bit? Meh. Plenty of room for speculation, but most of the speculation I have read has been bad.Wow. Embrassing leftist behaviour ITT when Fawlty is the best liberal poster in a thread...