- Joined
- Nov 25, 2015
- Messages
- 13,003
- Reaction score
- 5,437
The Nazi's murdered their dissidents in mass.
How can that not be evil against their own people?
Yeah who needs women doctors, teachers or scientists?
The role of women is housewives or prostitutes
Yeah all those serfs were getting their phds n had amazing medical care
On paper...
If you’re a nationalist ahole it’s another thing.
It’s still better than getting slaughtered for your religion or hanged cause of the colour of your skin
That is close to 50% of euro population
Being killed for your political opinion > being killed for who you are n your ethnicity
I’m sure you would change your tune if you were shipped to a concentration camp n “evil” communists saved your ass
Mao was an incompetent boob who woefully mismanaged the Chinese economy, but no one (no one) has ever estimated that 78 million people died during the Cultural Revolution (lol), let alone that he (i.e. the Chinese government themselves) carried out the killings.
Numbers vary depending on the source. From 16,997,000 to 70,000,000.
"In Mao: The Unknown Story, Jung Chang and Jon Halliday claim that as many as 3 million people died in the violence of the Cultural Revolution. The Holocaust memorial museum puts the death toll between 5 and 10 million. The true figure of those who were persecuted or died during the Cultural Revolution however may never be known, since many deaths went unreported or were actively covered up by the police or local authorities. The state of Chinese demographics records at the time was also very poor, and the PRC has been hesitant to allow formal research into the period."
"Critics of Mao Zedong have argued Mao's China saw unprecedented losses of human life through inhuman economic policies such as the Great Leap Forward, slave labor through the Laogai, violent political purges such as the Cultural Revolution the Campaign to Suppress Counterrevolutionaries, and class extermination through land reform. The estimate of the minimum death toll is the sum of the minimum estimate of famine dead (15 million), land reform dead (800,000), Counterrevolutionaries dead (712,000), and Cultural Revolution dead (400,000) plus the minimum killed in the 1959 Tibetan uprising (85,000 to 87,000)."
Not really brah, he was basically an anarchist and wanted proletariat control over government during the transitional phase of eradicating it. But again it was just one guy's outlook and you can separate his good and bad analysis.
I'm no fan of Communism, but I have to believe that communists (although ill informed) believe that communism would do the world good. Their intentions are to help people, not to hurt people, even though they inevitably end up hurting people.
Contrast that with the Nazis, who intentionally tried to eradicate an entire people from the Earth. Can't really compare IMO.
And by communism i mean the soviet, applied variety, not marxist theory.
People cry a lot about Islam and how it is so dangerous, but in reality Islam at most causes people to commit inconsequential acts that dont threaten the entire world, as opposed to communism which caused the world humanitarian disasters of all time. Why do i think its particularly evil? as opposed to say nazism?
Well for once Nazism never hid its intentions and its was a supremacist movement that called for a particular people to expand forever and over others, which of course generated a lot of pushback from other nations.
But communism is the story of Hanzel and Gretel given to a nation, its a system that promises heaven and brings out hell.
"Doesnt matter if we go around naked, doesnt matters if we dont even have anything to eat, what its important is to save the revolution".
That was a speech that Chavez gave over a decade ago, he certainly knew where he was taking the country to.
And by communism i mean the soviet, applied variety, not marxist theory.
Islam made the mistake of murdering thousands of Americans.
I kind of take that personal.
Check your premise.
Not only is Marxist theory immoral and evil, Karl Marx himself was an immoral and evil man.
The theory is immoral and evil because it serves as nothing more than an ex post facto justification for those who want to take by force what they themselves would be unable or unwilling to achieve and earn themselves.
The Nazi's murdered their dissidents in mass.
How can that not be evil against their own people?
Kind of like drop everything you own, follow me or burn in hell? Marxism is not more evil than other religions.
Applied marxism however...
You should read my post again.
You quoted me there like Fake News would.
Relatively speaking, Nazis looked up to exalt the german race at the cost of others. They didnt commited mass starvations of their "own". And their open declaration of supremacy was like a declaration of war against the others.
Soviets on the other hand promised a candy house, and then proceeded to mass starve people to death.
Unlike most people in here and on this board as a whole, I’ll take the opinion of someone who actually lives in the region being discussed.You should read my post again.
You quoted me there like Fake News would.
I did not say anything about prostitutes. But yeah women should not be involved in politics, unless it is symbolic like a Queen or something.
Well those serfs never got their PHDs and medical care under Soviets either, because they were dead.
Soviets literally slaughtered people because of their religion, and killing people because of the color of their skin is not better or worse than killing people because of their sosial class. Same shit.
Some of my ancestors were literally "evil communists" and they got shipped to Gulag. So...
btw Homosovieticus is not the same as Russian, just saying