- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Messages
- 170
- Reaction score
- 16
Yes. It's arbitrary. One question. At what point did wlad an ATG look better than he did in the Joshua fight? I think that's the marker right there.
Age is just a number.
I think you'll be digging quite far back to see him being better than that. So it is arbitrary.
You'd agree that there's *some* age range at which a fighter is no longer able to compete at the elite level?
If so, why wouldn't early 40s be the period of decline? Even gracefully ageing heavyweights who benefited from modern training like Foreman and Vitali were inferior at that age to their younger selves.
EDIT: edited second paragraph to clarify.
Last edited: