Defense Contributions of Nato Countries vs the Social Welfare Spending of Nato Countries

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Steve-French, Jul 12, 2018.

  1. Steve-French

    Steve-French What A Rush!!!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    13,841
    Likes Received:
    16,788
    Location:
    Marquette Michigan
    A lot of people like to look down there nose at the United States; but most of these countries have not been meeting their end of the bargain when it comes to contributing to Nato defense. (Which is 2% of their GDP)

    They also have jack shit for a military themselves and spend around 30% of their GDP on social service programs. I'm not opposed to social services by any means, but these countries are basically bumming the U.S.'s military support and then spending what they should be contributing to their defense and NATO on themselves.

    The following attachments are two graphs that depict the Defense expenditures of Nato countries and the list of Countries ranked by social welfare spending.

    Defense expenditures of Nato countries
    [​IMG]

    List of countries by social welfare spending
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
    HockeyBjj, D3THRONED and Smok3r like this.
  2. Smok3r

    Smok3r Silverback Belt Double Yellow Card Yellow Card Banned

    Joined:
    May 18, 2018
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    1,417
  3. Wet Blanket

    Wet Blanket Totally Radical Left Wing Vegan Misanthrope

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    1,527
    Location:
    Toronto
    Personally, I'd rather see money spent on helping people than killing people.
     
  4. OeuvrePressure

    OeuvrePressure Obama Jew

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    44,938
    Likes Received:
    62,766
    Location:
    Approximate
    Other countries hate the US.
    Is it jealousy because our women are hot, anger that we basically run that shit, or anxiety that they can't be Americans without passing a Freedoms test?
     
    M3t4tr0n and HomerThompson like this.
  5. Steve-French

    Steve-French What A Rush!!!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    13,841
    Likes Received:
    16,788
    Location:
    Marquette Michigan
    So would I, but I don't live in La La land and you can't have one without the other. Without the U.S. the two largest military powers (by a large margin) would be China and Russia.
     
    HockeyBjj, Ranzou**, ElKarlo and 3 others like this.
  6. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    32,167
    Likes Received:
    24,826
    So, we should cut back our military spending to increase our social welfare spending while the other countries increase their military spending?

    I get the point of demanding that they hold up their military spending req's on NATO but what does social welfare spending matter unless we're saying that we would spend more on our social welfare programs as a result?
     
  7. Renard

    Renard Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    4,275
    Likes Received:
    7,604
    It's America's choice to spend 700B a year on the military, nobody is forcing you to do anything. You're free to slash that by half tomorrow if you wanted to, and allied countries would adjust and compensate their spending accordingly.

    America is like having a weird friend who LOVES stamps. Completely obsessed with them. He has stacks upon stacks of the stuff, he reminds you every time you speak to him how awesome and rare his stamp collection is. He doesn't have letters to send or anything, he wants them just because. He doesn't care that he spends far more on those stamps that is needed, the expense is not logical. Allied countries are looking at each other and they're like "Well our friend's got the stamps covered, I guess. Let's order paper and office chairs."
     
  8. SammyPops

    SammyPops Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    19,163
    Likes Received:
    9,854
    Location:
    Sitting beside Patient Zero
    This was the post WW2 paradigm, which the US thrived off for years, so whats the problem now?
     
    Possum Jenkins likes this.
  9. IngaVovchanchyn

    IngaVovchanchyn Titanium Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    35,617
    Likes Received:
    48,930
    I could care less what other countries spend their money on. None of my business. It is my business though that they constantly fail to fulfill their military commitments of our treaty together.

    US tolerance of NATO freeloading has allowed European governments to develop a complacent attitude toward their defensive commitments. In the words of Barack Obama:
    [​IMG]
     
  10. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    32,167
    Likes Received:
    24,826
    We now have a decision maker who seems antagonistic to the soft benefits of the relationship. I don't know if he's right or not but I do know that it will end our "first among equals" status.
     
  11. Teppodama

    Teppodama Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    7,178
    Likes Received:
    10,665
    Location:
    Online
    Depends on the people...for both.
     
    spamking, Greoric and IngaVovchanchyn like this.
  12. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    32,167
    Likes Received:
    24,826
    True and those countries/Obama negotiated an agreement to get up to 2% by 2025. Trump isn't addressing a new problem but he is trying to push the compliance period forward despite the prior agreement. That's where the concerns start for me. We're renegotiating a deal on the fly and I think that always hurts relationships when done poorly.

    You see it all of the time. 2 parties enter into a contract and then one party suddenly tries to switch up the terms after the fact. It often leads to the 2 parties not entering into mutually beneficial contracts in the future because the other side starts looking to make exclusively beneficial arrangements to protect themselves from a repeat performance of the last minute terms switch.

    If you're never going to work with them again, fine. But if you're going to need them down the road, it can ruin those opportunities.
     
    Kafir-kun and HomerThompson like this.
  13. SammyPops

    SammyPops Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    19,163
    Likes Received:
    9,854
    Location:
    Sitting beside Patient Zero

    You will still be first, but your equals will be Russia, North Korea, and maybe some other greats such as Sudan
     
    HomerThompson and panamaican like this.
  14. lifelessheap

    lifelessheap Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Messages:
    12,718
    Likes Received:
    13,522
    We should take a year off from funding it and use the money on our roads.
     
    Rematch, spamking, OCGSC and 4 others like this.
  15. HunterSdVa29

    HunterSdVa29 Respect, tho Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2010
    Messages:
    29,185
    Likes Received:
    23,306
    Location:
    29 Palms (from San Diego)
    well ya....

    the refugees weren't trying to stay in Poland and Slovakia if you feel me, but the UK, Germany and Sweden

    wonder why that is?
     
  16. flashNsmash

    flashNsmash when it rains...

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    16,871
    Likes Received:
    3,637
    turkey getting a lot of bang for the buck imo
     
  17. Steve-French

    Steve-French What A Rush!!!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    13,841
    Likes Received:
    16,788
    Location:
    Marquette Michigan
    It would be nice if we could cut back our military and spend more on social services, but we are kind of stuck, because there is nobody out there to wipe our ass, because we know that China and Russia sure as hell aren't going to do it.

    I guess this is the consequence of being the #1 super power and we made our own bed, but for people of the U.S. wanting to disarm and follow the model of the European/Canadian Socialist models have to realize that we can't do that, because in the end nobody has our back like we do their's.
     
    spamking and flashNsmash like this.
  18. Rod1

    Rod1 Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    43,186
    Likes Received:
    27,914
    Location:
    Sonora, Mexico.
    The number discrepancies is still pretty large, so its still a myth that the US subsidizes European welfare.

    I mean Germany only needs to cut 3% of its welfare (25.3 of GDP) to meet NATO requirements (2 minus the 1.2 it already spends).
     
    M3t4tr0n and HomerThompson like this.
  19. cincymma79

    cincymma79 Red Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    9,613
    Likes Received:
    5,402
    Do you want money for those programs or not
     
  20. Rod1

    Rod1 Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    43,186
    Likes Received:
    27,914
    Location:
    Sonora, Mexico.
    Why not? you have nukes, you have like 10 carrier battlegroups, cut military spending in half and the US would still be as safe.
     

Share This Page