- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Messages
- 11,107
- Reaction score
- 3
Better than Triple 9.
alot better
Better than Triple 9.
I assumed that film excellence award show. And what I meant by that was that if the film wasn't made to break new grounds in content or excellence while still being enjoyable it should be rated accordingly.
^That's about the best explanation I can give.
The oscar quote was taken from @MadSquabbles500 post. What do you want me to explain specifically?
I'm not sure how revolutionary The Mummy was, but it's a strong 8.5 or 9/10 for me.
It's not the kind of movie that will ever get any love at the Oscars, except perhaps in one of the technical categories.
I took the day off work and went to see this with the wife today. I really liked it. It's easily better than Triple 9, but not quite as good as The Town. I enjoyed the ending (I won't spoil anything), which sets this one apart from others in this genre a bit.
It's also nice to see some UFC talent in there, former and current.
How do Murican's feel about Gerard Butler's attempts at a Murican accent? To my ear it sounds bloody awful and it always seems like he has to channel so much of his energy into keeping it going that his performances always suffer as a result of it. I mean I should be clear in saying I don't think he's a very good actor to begin with but I think he'd do a lot better if he just went the Sean Connery route and stuck with his native accent for the most part.
I agree, but I do like that it requires you to replay parts of the film back in your head and put the pieces together. I like that extra layer of complexity. It could also set the stage for a part 2. Maybe.Regarding the ending, I didn't have strong feelings about it either way, but I felt it was kind of unnecessary. The story would've worked just as well without trying to shock us with a big twist at the end.
I was shocked to see it had such a low score on RT. If only this were a Marvel or Star Wars movie it'd be sitting at a cool 80% right now.......
If you are talking about Pablo Schreiber then he is great in American Gods...it's not a movie but still a good show.Den of thieves is a pretty cool action flick. i agree towards the end you could of shaved off like 20 minutes but this movie delivers in action, it takes less than 5 minutes for the action to start. All the action in this film is pretty realistic looking and not over the top bullshit like fast n the furious.it has very cool moments throughout the film.
I love the kid scene that came to pick up 50 cents daughter, that scene was pure gold.
The main villain is pretty intimidating and would like to see him in more films, he has a very commanding presence on screen.
The star of the show to me was gerald Butler. The man plays a great nut. Hugh jackman would play an awesome last of us Joel but butler in this film made me think there was more than just one guy out there that could pull it off. Every time butler was on screen he stole the show.
Give it a 7 out of 10. I actually want to watch it again after just seeing it today
Nice! Take THAT, critics!
I'm glad the film is a success and that regular moviegoers have responded positively to it.
Have you seen Street Kings?
That is one similar to this movie that was pissed on by the critics but its solid as fuck
It might be one of my favorite movies even
Like I said earlier, comparisons are inevitable but it's not like Heat invented the sub-genre or was the first one to do a lot of the shit that it did.
To go back to Point Break, would we have even gotten Heat if Point Break hadn't come out a few years earlier? Who knows, but it's hard to believe that PB didn't influence Mann at all. But you don't hear anyone saying, "Ahh yeah, that Den of Thieves, the Point Break ripoff."