- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 26,619
- Reaction score
- 9,313
Gsp vs Hendricks
Rampage vs Griffin
Lawler vs condit
Rampage vs Griffin
Lawler vs condit
Discussion: Robberies that weren't robberies in retrospect.
- Thread starter The Natural Born Runner
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2012
- Messages
- 9,244
- Reaction score
- 321
Bisping is one of my least favorite fighters ever. But I still stand by the Hamill decision. He did more from his back in rds 2 and 3 and won the stand up exchanges. Clearly lost 1 though.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2010
- Messages
- 13,058
- Reaction score
- 1,499
Do bro,
If I watched it again I could tell you the exact moments in the rounds he took the fight.
It's one of the best examples of shoddy criteria for judging in MMA - at the time take-downs were scored the same as knockdowns - so it was easy for me to predict at the end of the fight.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 11,968
- Reaction score
- 4,720
I have changed my mind after rewatching a few, most notable is Jones vs Gus which I had Gus 48-47 then Jones 48-47.Another one that's controversial is Hendricks vs GSP,in which I always had GSP 48-47 and I think Dana White freaking out is one of the reasons people are so crazy about the decision and the fact that Hendricks did more damage and actually gave GSP a hell of a fight when people expected GSP to dominate like usual
People were crazy about Rampage over Shogun just because Rampage had a surprised look on his face which he was probably just clowning around like he always is,he won that fight.
People were crazy about Rampage over Shogun just because Rampage had a surprised look on his face which he was probably just clowning around like he always is,he won that fight.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 3,151
- Reaction score
- 12
GSP/Hendricks
The night of I thought Hendricks won 49-46, and thought it was the worst robbery.
I’ve rewatched it several times, and I can see how people score it 48-47 for GSP.
I still thought Hendricks won 48-47, but it’s not nearly as bad of a robbery as I thought it was on fight night.
The thing about that fight is the rounds that Hendricks won, were won a lot more convincingly than the rounds GSP won.
The night of I thought Hendricks won 49-46, and thought it was the worst robbery.
I’ve rewatched it several times, and I can see how people score it 48-47 for GSP.
I still thought Hendricks won 48-47, but it’s not nearly as bad of a robbery as I thought it was on fight night.
The thing about that fight is the rounds that Hendricks won, were won a lot more convincingly than the rounds GSP won.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2016
- Messages
- 2,526
- Reaction score
- 0
It is up for debate judging by the fact that most people in this thread upon rewatch scored it for GSP, and so did the judges. Don't be salty.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2012
- Messages
- 6,782
- Reaction score
- 0
Nothing to be debated. It’s GSP fans who score for him to rationalize a robbery. No debate to be had: GSP lost.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
- Messages
- 1,139
- Reaction score
- 1
I gave every round to Cody just because how shocked I was to see Cruz getting clowned it was honestly the worst scoring I've ever done, since then I haven't watched the fight but I just know I've scored it really badly.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Messages
- 9,488
- Reaction score
- 3,868
Bisping-Henderson 2
10-8 Henderson
10-9 Henderson
10-9 Bisping
10-9 Bisping
10-9 Henderson
48-46 Henderson
10-8 Henderson
10-9 Henderson
10-9 Bisping
10-9 Bisping
10-9 Henderson
48-46 Henderson
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 4,050
- Reaction score
- 0
Jones won 4 out of 5 rounds?
Really?
Can you be more specfic?
Like Which rounds did Jones win and why?
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2013
- Messages
- 8,537
- Reaction score
- 53
I had the exact opposite reaction to jones/Gus. Gave it to Jon 48-47 the night of, rewatched it last year and only gave him round 5.
The widespread belief that sanchez kampmann was a huge robbery is one of the weirdest things and a great example of both confirmation bias and groupthink. Watch those last two rounds really closely, there is no way anyone can make the argument that kampmann clearly won those rounds. It also baffles me how people can't see the obvious logical flaw in judging a fight based on superficial damage.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 18,204
- Reaction score
- 6,658
It's not hating, I just want to point out, there is no such thing as stealing rounds in the rule book. Also, in judging aggression is the third criteria after effective striking and grappling. U think they were even in those regards and had to base the round off aggression?
I rewatched that fight way too many times and maybe only once or twice gave Diego a single round
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 18,204
- Reaction score
- 6,658
Bisping/hammil
When I first watched it I thought Matt won every round MAYBE lost 1...
After rewatching it and watching countless other close fights/robberies it wasn't ALL THAT bad and COULD HAVE gone to bisping. I just think it was the first "major" "robbery" of the new era and left a bitter taste cause how shitty of a person bisping was
When I first watched it I thought Matt won every round MAYBE lost 1...
After rewatching it and watching countless other close fights/robberies it wasn't ALL THAT bad and COULD HAVE gone to bisping. I just think it was the first "major" "robbery" of the new era and left a bitter taste cause how shitty of a person bisping was
I remember watching Bisping vs. Hammil and thinking Bisping won. Upon watching again I realized that Hammil actually won. Rewatched Jones vs. Gus and initially thought Jones won 3-2. After watching again I realized Jones won every round aside for perhaps round 3.
Had Hendricks beating GSP, rewatched it and had him beating him even worse. Biggest robbery I've ever seen. If you think GSP deserved that because of a jab and a failed submission attempt in r1 after getting his face smashed then go watch ballet please.
