You're catching some shit because the thread reads like an attempt to construct an acceptable position for victim blaming. It's not a comprehension problem, but a problem where your words, rightly or wrongly, are not taken at face value.
If you want to be utilitarian about it, this Weinstein case is a really good example of how blaming the predator loudly and openly is what gets shit done. Actresses who rebuffed him and succeeded did so despite that, not because of it. It took a whole lot of abuse before any good came of people complaining about him- it took a public shaming to fix this.
One thing I'd look at is that Hollywood doesn't have ethics to match corporate America (jesus that sounds funny). What I mean is that out in the normal work environment, there are laws and policies about hiring, relationships, behavior, etc. In movies, the producer can hire and fire almost anybody for any reason, especially up-and-comers. That environment is mostly neutral toward unethical behavior, and there are individual rewards (sometimes great rewards) for doing nothing about it, or for being complicit. The arts understandably don't want an environment like a 9-5 job because it murders creativity, and it's exactly the sort of life that artists don't want. They're going to have to correct for the tendency toward corruption without damaging the artistic environment. The problem will keep arising, but incidents like this, where producers and directors are put on notice, will help the next time a big player takes things too far.
