England-Deadly crossbows sold on High Street without need for a licence or background checks

maybe so.

globally though, as countries develop, calls for gun controls, like most other regulations, seem to increase among the population. people stop wanting lead dumped into their drinking water. they want people to stop at stop lights. they see less of a need for their neighbors to be armed.
The correlation is not necessarily causal, though. Economic prosperity is correlated with less external threat. If you aren’t constantly under threat of invasion, you tend to become more prosperous. This may seem like a nit picky distinction, but it’s an important one. If the cause of the population’s desire to legislate weapons is based on perceived threat level, rather than economic factors, than it becomes more unpredictably variable, and can lead to unintended consequences such as a black market for weaponry. The consequences of such a black market could be disasterous, similar to the market for narcotics.
 
ConcernedEnviousDrever-size_restricted.gif
that was aimed at you lol
 
Your gif betrays you.
it was mocking you for thinking I actually thought you were being racist

take your time though, wouldnt want this information to go over your head also ;)
 
The correlation is not necessarily causal, though. Economic prosperity is correlated with less external threat. If you aren’t constantly under threat of invasion, you tend to become more prosperous. This may seem like a nit picky distinction, but it’s an important one. If the cause of the population’s desire to legislate weapons is based on perceived threat level, rather than economic factors, than it becomes more unpredictably variable, and can lead to unintended consequences such as a black market for weaponry. The consequences of such a black market could be disasterous, similar to the market for narcotics.

ok.

could the perceived level of threat from your neighbors not also be a factor? as a country develops, violent crime rate drops.
 
Not just crossbows.
Not just assault-style crossbows.
But DEADLY, assault-style crossbows.

<mma4>
 
ok.

could the perceived level of threat from your neighbors not also be a factor? as a country develops, violent crime rate drops.
Certainly, crime plays a role in perceived threats and leads to greater, or lesser, levels in firearm ownership. There’s a broad correlation with economic development and a lowering of violent crime, but there are situations that can lead to high levels of violent crime even within developed nations. As an example, the 1920s, 1950s, and 1980s/90s were all periods of economic booms that also saw increases in violent crime. This can be due to increases in large urban centers (more people in one area, more crime), increased immigration (different populations interacting violently), and the end of a major conflict (collective trauma of citizens plus PTSD amongst vets). There are a myriad of factors that can lead to increased violent crime, while not decreasing economic prosperity. That’s why I’d be hesitant to link a feeling of “safety” with being a developed nation. Just as an example, look at the people on this board who are European and worry about terrorism. Statistically they are in some of the most developed nations on earth, with some of the lowest chances for conflict or violent crime, yet I could certainly see a market opening up for the procurement of illicit weapons due to the perception of a lack of safety. That opened black market could lead to an increase in organized crime, further perception of lack of safety, greater procurement of arms, etc. without any change in the development or economic standing of the country.
 
yet I could certainly see a market opening up for the procurement of illicit weapons due to the perception of a lack of safety.

i doubt it. not in western europe.

and just because a country experiences an economic boom, does not make it a developed country. just because there is an economic downturn, does not make you a developing country. that may not be what you meant, but you seemed to imply that.
 
i doubt it. not in western europe.

and just because a country experiences an economic boom, does not make it a developed country. just because there is an economic downturn, does not make you a developing country. that may not be what you meant, but you seemed to imply that.
True, I’m merely trying to relate my point specifically to the United States. Still, developed nations like the United States, Norway, Finland, and Germany all are within the top 15 for per capita firearm ownership, while Fiji, the Solomon Islands, and Ghana have some of the lowest rates. This would more support that there’s something else, other than whether a country is developed, that determines personal firearm ownership. As for Germany, they’re police union, the GdP, estimates there are ~20 million illegally owned firearms in Germany, pushing their per capita rate up from 7/100 to 24/100.
 
Allright, I'm done being a jackass for one day.

We might not see eye to eye on a lot of things but never stop being a jackass. It's always a great read.
 
I swear we are gonna have to liberate them some day at the rate they are going . No guns no knives no porno no crossbows no memes no freespeech no legal weed. Fools cant rest on 2 tone ska and a spiffy flag forever
Eh...Only Scotland has oil. Leave England to the muhammedans.
 
Shit's going to get medieval in there. Bring back the longbows.
 


Had a walk over to the shop in question now, it's just a little shop tucked away on the edge of the market.

175lb crossbow still on sale.

As long as there no crimes being committed I'm not bothered
PDlXuGm
 
Back
Top