Firearms News thread

http://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...mental-army-rifle-uses-telescoped-ammunition/







1475091330-ctammo.jpg


I wonder how would they not lose accuracy from the tremendous leap the bullet has to take getting to the barrel lands? Wonder how you'd clear a jam when the plastic fucks up and gets glued in there?

I half looked through their sales pitch to the military doc but its all propaganda anyway so they can try and recoup the cost of developing it.

Forwarded that to some of my goon friends, here's what one of them said:

I have had a design for a case-less cartridge for years. Just think of all the projectiles you could carry as opposed to cartridges. Ignightablegas powered caseless gun using direct injection into combustion chamber.Only projectiles need to be loaded into the gun.The action only needs to move far enough to cycle the bullet not the cartridge thus increasing cyclical firing rate. The direct injection can keep introducing explosive gas into the combustion chamber keeping the chamber pressure maximum until the bullet leaves the barrel instead of dropping off to a 1000 psi or so increasing velocity to the max.
Thanks,
James Burnette
burnettearms.com

!!! I wonder if he's using a supercharged weed-eater motor to run this contraption of his?

Never mind, he just answered:

More like a pellet rifle using compressed explosive gas you could even use the recoil to supercharge the combustion chamber.

Maybe something like this?

VuP8fi.gif
 
Last edited:
Oh boy... there's a bow hunting thread in Mayberry... And I posted in it already.

FUCK ME.
 
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/11/14/potd-running-gunning-50-years/

Albrecht Moser is a former Swiss Soldier. He is a long distance runner and has competed in the Waffenlauf. The Waffenlauf is a 43K long race. So about the same as a marathon. Competitors are current or former military. The race must be ran wearing full uniform, marching boots, ruck that weighs no less than 13.6-pounds and includes either a standard Swiss Army Stgw 90 (SIG 550), Stgw 57 (SIG SG 510) or old school WWII-era K.31 bolt action rifle. Female soldiers are not required to carry a rifle but their packs must weigh 11 lbs.

Albrecht Moser has raced Waffenlauf since the 70s. He has 56 wins for long distance running. Eight of them are national championships. You can see he loves to run with his K31 Swiss.

Albrecht-Moser-in-1981.jpg


JGxb2kV-445x660.jpg
 
Some MOA info yo:

https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016...wsletter&utm_medium=insider&utm_campaign=1116

What MOA is Not: We measure groups with a ruler and should include the range to the target. But we measure MOA as an angle that applies to all distances. A gun that shoots 1-inch groups at 100 yards may shoot a 6-inch group at 600 and a 10-inch group at 1,000 yards. However, by definition, one minute of angle is the same measurement regardless of distance. It’s incorrect to mix the two with a phrase such as “the gun shoots 3 inches of MOA.”
moa1.jpg

Get Out Your Protractor: Each of the 360 degrees in a circle can be further divided into 60 minutes, which turns out to be a practical unit of measure for target shooting. We’ve been taught that one MOA from the 100-yard line equals one inch on the target (actually 1.047 inch), about 2 inches at 200 yards and so on. And we know that sights with finer threads can produce smaller adjustment increments so that ¼ MOA, for example, mathematically moves the point of impact ¼ inch at 100 yards, ½ inch at 200 yards, etc.

By turning the formula around, we can divide inches of desired movement on the target by the MOA increment to figure out how many clicks are required for that correction. So, in order to move the point of impact 4 inches at 200 yards with a ¼ MOA sight, we would calculate: ¼ MOA sight x 200 yards = ½ inch per click. Divide 4 inches of movement by ½ inch per click to learn it would take 8 clicks to achieve our goal. (Hang in there, the fun part is coming.) Armed with this knowledge, we can make some notes for the firing line.

From the online NRA Rule Book we learn:

4.3 200 Yard Targets
(a) No. SR - Military “Target, Rifle, Competition, Short Range.

Aiming Black (inches)
X ring . . . . . . . .3.00
10 ring . . . . . . .7.00
9 ring . . . . . . . .13.00

Rings in White (inches)
8 ring . . . . . . . . 19.00
7 ring . . . . . . . . 25.00
6 ring . . . . . . . . 31.00
5 ring . . . . . . . . 37.00

Using the above data, a sample reference card for ¼ MOA sights at the 200-yard line might look something like the table below. To avoid the mental calisthenics of translating the table into sight clicks, some shooters prefer to use a graphic that displays clicks only.
moa-200yd.jpg


Sight Radius:
Given the triangle formed by rear sight height, sight radius along the barrel and line-of-sight to the target, if you move the front sight forward, as when adding a “bloop tube,” the point of aim will rise and the MOA adjustment value will diminish, ever so slightly.

Measuring Groups: Using the USAMU protocol, measure the center-to-center distance on the vertical axis of the group (V in the diagram), another for the horizontal center-to-center distance (H) and the extreme spread (ES), then average them (divide by three) for the resulting group size (not MOA).
moa-v.jpg

If you have access to a scanner or digital photography, try Jeffrey Block’s free software program. His OnTarget software allows you to import a scanned or photographed target into the software for measurement. If photographed, you’ll have to enter the distance between the camera lens and the target to keep everything straight. Scanning requires no such data and is therefore somewhat simpler to use. The user is then required to enter the caliber and distance to the target. The user then positions the proportionately correct graphic circles on top of each bullet hole to precisely mark the center of each shot. Zooming in makes it easier for exact placement of the circles. Once marked, the program quickly calculates several measurements such as MOA, group center and maximum group spread. View OnTarget and a tutorial video at www.ontargetshooting.com.

The Math: If you sat in the front row of math class, you already know this.

1. 360 degrees x 60 minutes per degree equals 21,600 minutes in a circle. Next, we need to know how many inches are in a particular circle, based on the distance to the target.

2. The circumference of a circle calculates as: Pi (3.14) x circle’s diameter.

3. We get the diameter from 2 x radius (distance to the target) … so, from 100-yards (radius), the diameter is 2 x (100 yards x 36 inches) or 7,200 inches.

4. (From step 2) 3.14 x 7,200 = 22,608 inches in the circumference of this circle.

5. A circumference of 22,608 inches divided by 21,600 minutes = 1.047 inches on the circumference (target) for each MOA, in this case, at a radius (shooting distance) of 100 yards.

Continuing on we see that:

One Minute of Angle =
1.047 inch at 100 yards.
2.093 inches at 200 yards.
3.140 inches at 300 yards.
6.280 inches at 600 yards.
10.467 inches at 1,000 yards.

And for my bullseye pistol friends:
.262 inch at 25 yards.
.523 inch at 50 yards.
 
Government. :)

http://kitup.military.com/2016/11/congress-army-marines-rifle-ammo.html

The Marine Corps and the Army use different rifle ammo — and Congress is demanding a report explaining why.

The Marine Corps uses an M855 5.56 mm round, while the Army uses the M855A1. The Army moved away from the M855 in 2010 after finding that the M855A1 steel-and-copper round performed better. The Marine Corps planned to do the same, but the project was sidetracked in 2009 when some bullets did not follow their trajectory in testing.
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/sig-p320-u-armys-sidearm-193331061.html

After a two-year, $17 million dollar search involving 12 contestants, the U.S. Army has finally picked its first new handgun in 32 years. The Sig Sauer P320 Compact pistol is now the M17 handgun, replacing the M9 Beretta.

In 2014, the Army announced a coming competition for a new handgun to replace the M9. Twelve companies entered the fray, including the Beretta APX, Ceská zbrojovka's CZ P-09, FN Herstal's Five-Seven Mk 2 handgun, the General Dynamics and Smith & Wesson M&P, the full-sized Glock 17 and compact Glock 19; and the Sig Sauer P320. Sig Sauer and Glock were selected as finalists last December. Yesterday, at the 2017 SHOT Show gun industry event in Las Vegas, Army officials notified Sig Sauer of their win.
 
I don't get the move to Sig. With JSOC guys basically all switching to the G19 you'd think standard issue would be that as well so that they could just throw mags in a giant fucking barrel and have everyone pull from said barrel whether they are Rangers, SEALs, Delta, MARSOC, or standard infantry.
 
Back
Top