France to Ban Showing the World Cup in Public for Fear of Terrorism

[Tiny]

Well...

At least they admit there is a problem...

 

[HIMBOB]

Didn't vote. Don't know enough about their Intel that led to this decision.

 

[Bloodworth]

Your losing as a nation if you cannot show soccer without fear of terrorist.

Invite the attackers, wait for it and attack right back.

Only problem is, people are very against fighting back.

 

[Billy no mates]

If France works like every other first world country, this will be because their intelligence services have come across plausible threats.

It’s fucked up, but In reality, the best thing they can do for the country and the world long term is allow the display and watch a truck drive though a crowd. Maybe people will get it then.

Although if targeting and blowing up young girls with a nail bomb at an ariana grande concert doesn’t turn the world against you, maybe we’re too far gone.

Speaking of which, anyone else wonder why we never hear about that bombing compared to other terrorist attacks?

We hear about it a lot , the anniversary was widely commemorated and reported on .

 

[Billy no mates]

Your losing as a nation if you cannot show soccer without fear of terrorist.

Invite the attackers, wait for it and attack right back.

Only problem is, people are very against fighting back.

So invite a suicide bomber in and then attack them....very clever why hasn't anyone else thought of that ? .

 

[Harry Flashman]

I voted yes. Of course they should ban all public congregations larger than three individuals.

Or they could get the terrorists the fuck out of their country instead.

 

[Bloodworth]

So invite a suicide bomber in and then attack them....very clever why hasn't anyone else thought of that ? .

Look to first world nations that have large events and the same threats.

There are different levels of security and they would be seen before they got through the first.

One thing countires should never do is change in the wake of terrorism.

You never negotiate or change because of filthy animal, out of date ,sub human terrorist.

And if there are that many in your country with the potential of coming terror. You already failed at some level and now have to learn from your mistakes and clean up the mess you created

 

[Billy no mates]

Look to first world nations that have large events and the same threats.

There are different levels of security and they would be seen before they got through the first.

One thing countires should never do is change in the wake of terrorism.

You never negotiate or change because of filthy animal, out of date ,sub human terrorist.

And if there are that many in your country with the potential of coming terror. You already failed at some level and now have to learn from your mistakes and clean up the mess you created

We removed rubbish bins when American backed terrorists were putting bombs in them and patrolled airport perimeters when they were launching mortars .

We eventually negotiated a ceasefire with those terrorists .

Countries change and compromise because of terrorism all the time .

 

[Hard To Tell]

This is why it's so sad and pathetic when our politicians, the media and the legions of mindless drones out there parrot the empty platitudes about carrying on as normal and not letting the terrorists win or change our way of life. It's such utter bullshit. Then the people who come out with this crap always say it tandem with the 'not real Muslims/nothing to do with Islam/Islam is a religion of peace/diversity is our greatest strength' lies. Which says it all really.

We've got no chance of changing anything or defeating the plague of Islamic terror sweeping Europe until we sort these scumbags out first. But just look at something like the grooming gangs here in the UK, lots of the Labour councils who happily let it all happen, went after the victims and helped cover it up, were still re-elected even after the truth came out. And it's not just Muslims voting for this. So you get to the point where you think to yourself 'what are you supposed to do when so many people are still this uncaring, vile and ignorant? What hope is there?'

The Islamic shit bags raping our kids, plowing trucks into people and setting off nail bombs are merely a symptom of a much deeper problem.

 

[cincymma79]

So invite a suicide bomber in and then attack them....very clever why hasn't anyone else thought of that ? .

We did it. Gave the guy a fake bomb and everything

 

[Bloodworth]

We removed rubbish bins when American backed terrorists were putting bombs in them and patrolled airport perimeters when they were launching mortars .

We eventually negotiated a ceasefire with those terrorists .

Countries change and compromise because of terrorism all the time .

Sounds like losing

 

[Fedorable]

We did it. Gave the guy a fake bomb and everything

a fake bomb salesman. sounds like a win-win.

 

[cincymma79]

a fake bomb salesman. sounds like a win-win.

It was a great story. The fuckhead hit the button and nothing happened except for the authorities arresting him

 

[Billy no mates]

Sounds like losing

Sounds like real life rather than meaningless soundbites , things like increased security at airports or more powers to security services are pretty standard responses .

 

[Thrawn33]

So France surrenders again?

 

[TheFirstEMP]

And this was the crowd gathered in Washington for game 5 of the Stanley cup finals just the other day.

 

[Bloodworth]

Sounds like real life rather than meaningless soundbites , things like increased security at airports or more powers to security services are pretty standard responses .

You say so

 

[Amerikuracana]

It's almost like it's getting bad enough that something drastic has to be done..


Oh no, wait, Mr. Drumpf is the bad guy because of his German last name. I forgot who the media told me the enemy is again. Oh yeah, nothing specific, but Russia.

 

[MadSquabbles500]

This is a good idea. There are many dangerous terrorists waiting for perfect moment to strike.

 

[SaiWa]

Look to first world nations that have large events and the same threats.

There are different levels of security and they would be seen before they got through the first.

One thing countires should never do is change in the wake of terrorism.

You never negotiate or change because of filthy animal, out of date ,sub human terrorist.

And if there are that many in your country with the potential of coming terror. You already failed at some level and now have to learn from your mistakes and clean up the mess you created

WTF are you talking about?

We change all the time. Our airport screening security was only completely revamped after 9/11. Maybe you didn’t fly often but I did and certainly remember waiting 2-3 hours to go through those lines back when it wasn’t streamlined.

Yes we have tons of public events and we spend tons on security but it’s a huge concern every time. French government felt it was safer to ban public viewing of the World Cup. It’ll be up to each city to fund and organize proper security measures if they plan on defying the law. Most of those people will be at a bar anyway.

France will have even more to worry about if they win the World Cup (and they are one of the favorites). Massive celebration on the streets. Plenty of congregated soft targets opportunities if that happens...