In fact, lets be clear, you have indicated your belief that Steroids are far worse PED infractions than other non-steroid PED infractions.[/quote[
No. I have indicated that it's perfectly fine to assume that Barnett tested for steroids since, you know, he's done it before. 3 times. Maybe worry less about my ability to read and start worrying about your own, because you're making things up now.
I responded: Josh got suspended for 6 months for testing positive for THREE steroids Boldenone, Nandrolone & Fluoxymesterone, and DID NOT have the "win" result of his bout from the failure from THREE steroids reversed.
Okay. Wonderful. I wasn't commenting on his suspensions. I was commenting on his positive tests. I dunno where you're going with the length of his suspensions in the past, but it literally has nothing to do with my post above, so again, why did you quote me?
I also pointed out how a certain Mark Hunt had two fighters recently fail drug tests. In the case of Bigfoot, the AC reverses ONE OF THE TWO god damn fighters result (Bigfoot) WITHOUT changing the result of the others (Mark Hunt).
Okay. Fine. Again, I wasn't talking about that. What does that have to do with anything? You're just saying random things about other fighters completely uninvolved in this topic. Why?
Then a little bit later, Brock Lesnar fails due to some "non-steroid" (lesser PED infraction as you infer), and Mark gets BOTH his loss and Brock win overturned.
...this is about Barnett, not Hunt, Brock, or Bigfoot. Do you want to mention Barnett at all, or just rant about other topics?
The AC lets Steroid related results stand, and crucifies for less severe PED infractions.
...this is blatantly false, but yeah, sure, why not. You keep living in that false reality, buddy.
I will go on record, even if this fourth PED offense IS non steroid related, and is BY FAR the least "serious" of his four offenses, he is still likely to get a stiffer penalty for this one minor infraction that the three monster infractions combined.
Yes, he'll get a stiffer penalty. USADA has a 2 year minimum suspension for most prohibited substances. Whether it's steroids or diuretics or hGH or any other prohibited substance, this is now his 4th positive test. I'm not sure if they'll even count his other 3, but at the very least they'll use his history as aggravating circumstances, so he'll absolutely get whatever the max is for this substance, steroids or not. It's not some conspiracy as you seem to claim for no reason.
Again, your post was incoherent rambling that had nothing to do with my post or even this thread.