that's not how affirmative action works...you don't understand. the scenario you're discussing is one in which, say there are 100 positions for police officers in a city. 1000 people apply and take the test. the passing score is, say 85. let's say 150 white guys score in the 90's and 50 black guys score 86. that means there were 200 people who passed the test. but there's only 100 slots available. so, how do you decide which of the 200 applicants who passed the test to hire? well, that's when OTHER criteria come into play...criteria such as the needs of the community, etc...there may also be a psychological or physical agility component.
so, ALL 50 black guys got hired and only 50 white guys got hired. that's not unfairness based on race... the black guys all passed the test. they're not less qualified applicants who got hired ONLY because they were black.... they met the minimum score which is all they're required to do so, they're as qualified as the whites. if you can show me where a black guy who was UNQUALIFIED for a job got hired for a job ONLY because of his race, please go ahead...i'm waiting.
Because policing is a job that requires that the needs of the community must be considered as well, there may only be a need for the 50 white guys...those reasons aren't racist. it's based on need.
i'm black and i've been in a lot of situations where i was as qualified as any white candidate, in fact, i know of one case at least where i was the MOST qualified candidate...and they gave it to somebody else, because like it says on the job announcement, your qualifications (education, scores, etc) are only ONE factor....the human resources officer must also consider other factors such as how a particular applicant will fit in with the organization.
is that necessarily racist in your opinion?
of course they make mistakes all the time and hire the wrong guy, so that's why people get fired and the hiring process has to start all over again.