Google assigning 10,000 employees to "police" youtube content

another metatron and skallagrim fan?

<CerseiPlotting> <GinJuice>

I wouldn't say I'm a fan, but I've seen their videos for sure and enjoyed their content in the past.

I just know those types of guys have been hit pretty hard by this. Basically nothing they've ever done can be monetized now and they can't do anything to change it.
 
youtube....doesnt owe anyone anything...

just because your neighbors swimming pool is popular doesnt mean everyone can swim in it.

the right wingers like to point out entitlement issues in other people but become the worst culprits when their videos get taken down on youtube..A PRIVATE COMPANY...

solution?

make their own video hosting site.

I mean...the right is the party of personal repsonsibilty unlike those lazy liberals...
We are not talking about that.

We are talking about monetization, of which i have already stated my view point and work arounds.
 
I like the lefts response to this “ use a different video hosting site and they are a private company they can do what they want “ they all for capitalism unless a gay wedding and cake is involved, although not the same but similar. If rolls were reversed there would be a bigger out cry and highways would see ppl laying in the streets blocking traffic.
 
the mods here are a disaster.

:(
 
What is wrong with a video talking about wanking? I didnt watch it but i presume it's a serious explanation? If it is why moan about it? So many parents fail to teach their kids anything about sex so info on youtube is good.


Actually i did just watch some of it. It's a video to try and inform kids and give facts about wanking, yet the dildo is too disgusting to show and is pixelled out. How ridiculous. That isn't being honest, it implies something is bad about that thing on the table, typical!

However, google is bad, ok? It has far too much information and information brings power and it will be more powerful than the government at some stage. It has a monopoly.
 
I like the lefts response to this “ use a different video hosting site and they are a private company they can do what they want “ they all for capitalism unless a gay wedding and cake is involved, although not the same but similar. If rolls were reversed there would be a bigger out cry and highways would see ppl laying in the streets blocking traffic.
It's almost like they don't mind anything "right" being censored.

The best they got "it's not being censored or targeted" to avoid admitting it.
 
some of you guys complaining about decency, need to show some.


there's a line. you dont go calling someone pedo because he's disagreeing with you. or ever.
 
youtube....doesnt owe anyone anything...

just because your neighbors swimming pool is popular doesnt mean everyone can swim in it.

the right wingers like to point out entitlement issues in other people but become the worst culprits when their videos get taken down on youtube..A PRIVATE COMPANY...

solution?

make their own video hosting site.

I mean...the right is the party of personal repsonsibilty unlike those lazy liberals...
And the left likes to point out their hatred for corporations and companies/people getting too big and having too much power, until it suits them in the case of facebook and google, then they love monopolies.

If it's no problem, why don't they just say what they're doing and what their agenda is? They didn't grow to the size they have with these rules, they became a monopoly and then changed the rules once there was no competition.
 
It's almost like they don't mind anything "right" being censored.

The best they got "it's not being censored or targeted" to avoid admitting it.

They're demonetising gay videos as well, and left-wing political commentators like Tim Black and David Pakman, so really it's anything controversial. Like mainstream media has been for ages, and for similar reasons.
 
some of you guys complaining about decency, need to show some.


there's a line. you dont go calling someone pedo because he's disagreeing with you.
Piss off, the same guy accused me of condoning rape in another thread. The guy's illiterate trash and he came here acting like there's no middle ground between being a sheltered religious fanatic and posting videos of underage kids talking about losing their virginity while their parents simulate masturbation in front of them.
 
Piss off, the same guy accused me of condoning rape in another thread. The guy's illiterate trash and he came here acting like there's no middle ground between being a sheltered religious fanatic and posting videos of underage kids talking about losing their virginity while their parents simulate masturbation in front of them.

Fuck condoning rape too. It doesn't make you any less culpable for this.

Just an excuse for your own lack of decency.


And I'll say it publicly, yes I reported it. That kind of accusation needs to go
 
They've already demonetized virtually every right leaning channel on YT, even one's that aren't remotely egregious or have hate speech, etc...

My dude Razorfist got a vid demonetized that had literally him just sitting there and the video was titled (best video games of 2017)....he did it as a test, and sure enough.....

A couple of youtubers tested it. It seems that have a hidden blacklist, any videos uploaded by the blacklisted channels are automatically demonetized.
 
Fuck condoning rape too. It doesn't make you any less culpable for this.

Just an excuse for your own lack of decency.


And I'll say it publicly, yes I reported it. That kind of accusation needs to go
{<jordan}

{<jimmies}
 
We are not talking about that.

We are talking about monetization, of which i have already stated my view point and work arounds.
it goes hand in hand.

youtube doesnt have to allow ads on anything. especially if those companies dont want to be seen on certain topics.
 
They're demonetising gay videos as well, and left-wing political commentators like Tim Black, so really it's anything controversial. Like mainstream media has been for ages, and for similar reasons.
What's the ratio for videos "attributed" to the left , it could be for other reasons they were demonetized. I'd posit gay videos aren't even taking a political stance or opinion. Maybe someone at google thought it offends muslims? Who knows with the SJW hierarchy pyramid eating itself.

Either way it's clearly lopsided, there was a previous thread with plenty of examples, not many or any for the left.

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/u...beral-channels.3587337/page-10#post-133029379

it goes hand in hand.

youtube doesnt have to allow ads on anything. especially if those companies dont want to be seen on certain topics.

Youtube didn't seem to give a shit not too long ago. Now they've cemented a stranglehold on the ad revenue market, with no competition in sight, they're rolling out their agenda and you cheering them on because you agree with it.
 
What's the ratio for videos "attributed" to the left , it could be for other reasons they were demonetized. I'd posit gay videos aren't even taking a political stance or opinion. Maybe someone at google thought it offends muslims? Who knows with the SJW hierarchy pyramid eating itself.

Either way it's clearly lopsided, there was a previous thread with plenty of examples, not many or any for the left.

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/u...beral-channels.3587337/page-10#post-133029379



Youtube didn't seem to give a shit not too long ago. Now they've cemented a stranglehold on the ad revenue market, with no competition in sight, they're rolling out their agenda and you cheering them on because you agree with it.

You see what you want to see. The right-wing persecution complex. Youtube's clearly made a move towards standard models of commercialisation. They responded when advertisers pulled out on the basis of the videos their products were being shown on.
 
They didn't grow to the size they have with these rules, they became a monopoly and then changed the rules once there was no competition.
"gimme a C_A_P_I_T_A_L_I_S_M_"
patriots-cheerleaders-21.gif


no right winger should complain....
unless it affects them....
 
What's the ratio for videos "attributed" to the left , it could be for other reasons they were demonetized. I'd posit gay videos aren't even taking a political stance or opinion. Maybe someone at google thought it offends muslims? Who knows with the SJW hierarchy pyramid eating itself.

Either way it's clearly lopsided, there was a previous thread with plenty of examples, not many or any for the left.

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/u...beral-channels.3587337/page-10#post-133029379



Youtube didn't seem to give a shit not too long ago. Now they've cemented a stranglehold on the ad revenue market, with no competition in sight, they're rolling out their agenda and you cheering them on because you agree with it.
no I dont agree on it...but they have a right to do it...
 
Back
Top