- Joined
- Jan 20, 2007
- Messages
- 31,985
- Reaction score
- 11,765
Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to badExplain how I contradicted myself.
Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to badExplain how I contradicted myself.
Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to bad
I'm not a movie guy to tell the truth, I had to Google him to know who he was, rape by any one is a disgusting act. I don't see anyone jerking themselves. the conservatives will try to make this partisan but I don't think anything will stop them from seeing every thing through red glasses. I assume you fall right into line and site brietbart and limbo as fact all while blasting the left and media as fake even when they agree with .You notice how 1 side in here is actually publishing sources and material. While the other side is sitting in front of blown up pics of Harvey jerking them selves off
Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to bad
But that's not what he said, not at all.Lol. You don't even realize what you did here!!
You just proved the media will protect a known rapist because he is liberal.
I swear, you crack me up! You seriously thought you were clever here but proved the exact other side right!
But that's not what he said, not at all.
Lol. Judge much?I'm not a movie guy to tell the truth, I had to Google him to know who he was, rape by any one is a disgusting act. I don't see anyone jerking themselves. the conservatives will try to make this partisan but I don't think anything will stop them from seeing every thing through red glasses. I assume you fall right into line and site brietbart and limbo as fact all while blasting the left and media as fake even when they agree with .
The media couldn't find one willing victim to come forward?
That's because they never asked one to.
its what the article said!But that's not what he said, not at all.
But mere anonymous and unvetted sources are a-okay if you're not a liberal.its what the article said!
Read the article! then his response. They would not publish the stories because their journalistic integrity. It's bullshit. They had him on TAPE!
If you don't see it nothing will make u see it
Lol! This is what I was telling Trotsky. But he and his lackeys didn't catch itOh! So back then anonymous and unvetted sources were a no-no, huh? So what changed?
Amazing the poster(Trotsky) and his boys couldn't see the hypocrisy.But mere anonymous and unvetted sources are a-okay if you're not a liberal.
You're right. They didn't have enough proof
SNL still won't even crack a joke about it. They have more integrity than all of them apparently.
“Why didn’t big mouth Michael Che’ say anything about Harvey Weinstein on SNL “Weekend Update”? He’s got so much opinion about everything else ,” Pastor Darrell Scott, a Trump supporter, posted on Twitter.