Harvey Weinstein went unpunished for years bc journalists couldn't ethically report w/o hard sources

[SBJJ]

Explain how I contradicted myself.

Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to bad

 

[sensaisonnen]

Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to bad

He's a communist that thinks refugees are going to pay all my billzzz in 50 years....

Trosky I have some Detroit property for sale, lots of diversity and liberalism, just wait 50 years and they will be an advanced civilization, probably will succeed from the US and start their own communist version of Rome.

 

[MMAViewer]

You notice how 1 side in here is actually publishing sources and material. While the other side is sitting in front of blown up pics of Harvey jerking them selves off

I'm not a movie guy to tell the truth, I had to Google him to know who he was, rape by any one is a disgusting act. I don't see anyone jerking themselves. the conservatives will try to make this partisan but I don't think anything will stop them from seeing every thing through red glasses. I assume you fall right into line and site brietbart and limbo as fact all while blasting the left and media as fake even when they agree with .

 

[unimackpass]

NYT has its ideological agenda.


Stuart Taylor Jr.


And by bad journalism. Worse, perhaps, than the other recentTimes embarrassments. The Times still seems bent on advancing its race-sex-class ideological agenda, even at the cost of ruining the lives of three young men who ithas reason to know are very probably innocent. This at a time when many other true believers in the rape charge, such as feminist law professor Susan Estrich, have at last seen through the prosecution's fog of lies and distortions.

 

[Letssnuggle]

The media couldn't find one willing victim to come forward?

That's because they never asked one to.

 

[Trotsky]

Go read your original post them your post after. Most people saw it. If u don't to bad

So you're full of shit and flailing. Gotcha.

 

[Rematch]

Oh! So back then anonymous and unvetted sources were a no-no, huh? So what changed?

 

[Islam Imamate]

Lol. You don't even realize what you did here!!

You just proved the media will protect a known rapist because he is liberal.

I swear, you crack me up! You seriously thought you were clever here but proved the exact other side right!

But that's not what he said, not at all.

 

[FIMN]

But that's not what he said, not at all.

I read that post and thought... how the fuck, outside of a total lacking grasp of the English language, arrive at that conclusion?!

 

[SBJJ]

I'm not a movie guy to tell the truth, I had to Google him to know who he was, rape by any one is a disgusting act. I don't see anyone jerking themselves. the conservatives will try to make this partisan but I don't think anything will stop them from seeing every thing through red glasses. I assume you fall right into line and site brietbart and limbo as fact all while blasting the left and media as fake even when they agree with .

Lol. Judge much?

I don't care what party he is. I think Hollywood is full of cowards, that's not liberal or conservative

I'm libertarian and can't stand either party. But this is hypocrisy for sure when Liberal Hollywood turns a blind eye to this. Just like its hypocrisy when a pro lifer asks his girlfriend to abort a baby.

In fact. Would you say you can't judge that congressman who asked his gf to get an abortion?

 

[FIMN]

The media couldn't find one willing victim to come forward?

That's because they never asked one to.

I've always wondered the reason people talk about the 'mainstream' or 'liberal' media being one monolithic group, rather than it being a fluid, ever changing group of thousands of people each with their own priority and agenda.

I guess it makes it easier to think of these things in incredibly simple and general terms, especially if you need to have this group as an enemy of somekind.

 

[SBJJ]

But that's not what he said, not at all.

its what the article said!

Read the article! then his response. They would not publish the stories because their journalistic integrity. It's bullshit. They had him on TAPE!

If you don't see it nothing will make u see it

 

[Rematch]

its what the article said!

Read the article! then his response. They would not publish the stories because their journalistic integrity. It's bullshit. They had him on TAPE!

If you don't see it nothing will make u see it

But mere anonymous and unvetted sources are a-okay if you're not a liberal.

 

[InternetHero]

Like settling court accusation after accusation with out of court settlements, disappearing photographic records of assault, and the smearing of accusers.

Fake news.

 

[SBJJ]

Oh! So back then anonymous and unvetted sources were a no-no, huh? So what changed?

Lol! This is what I was telling Trotsky. But he and his lackeys didn't catch it

 

[SBJJ]

But mere anonymous and unvetted sources are a-okay if you're not a liberal.

Amazing the poster(Trotsky) and his boys couldn't see the hypocrisy.

Amazing the dude even posted it

 

[MilesAbove]

So, real story..... twice now I have been unable to tell reporters about systemic sexual assault occurring in MMA. I went to authorities, both times situations were settled out of court and anyway, and.... and because of contracts I can't disclose the info.

Interesting, right? It's almost like corporations know this will happen and just want to ignore it when you're dealing with big money.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

You're right. They didn't have enough proof

jeezus H.... groveling for pussy like that when you're rich and famous.... fuck man, get an escort you fucking creep.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

SNL still won't even crack a joke about it. They have more integrity than all of them apparently.

“Why didn’t big mouth Michael Che’ say anything about Harvey Weinstein on SNL “Weekend Update”? He’s got so much opinion about everything else ,” Pastor Darrell Scott, a Trump supporter, posted on Twitter.

 

[ShadowRun]

Very odd how this thread and source are compared to the ""McCain and the FBI and possibly DNC funded Trump Dossier" thread.

That thread is people going crazy claiming sources are fake or shouldn't be believed but this one sure unnamed sources are trustable.