- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
- Messages
- 7,473
- Reaction score
- 5,777
He arguably lost a fight,let alone a round.He's probably never lost a round in his fighting career
He arguably lost a fight,let alone a round.He's probably never lost a round in his fighting career
24-0 is really rare for anyone who's fought more than 10 times in the UFC so it looks amazing unlike boxing. But ya all marketing. Glover was like 20 -0 or something with 15 dudes no one heard ofMaybe the UFC knows that when casuals see "24-0" they go HOLY FUCK!!!!
I know I used to before coming to my senses
A lot of people think those are all UFC fights.
24-0 is really rare for anyone who's fought more than 10 times in the UFC so it looks amazing unlike boxing. But ya all marketing. Glover was like 20 -0 or something with 15 dudes no one heard of
Isn't Khabib like 24-0?The past little while every time I checked the LW rankings I found Khabib above Tony
They both have wins over RDA, the former champ, both fought Michael Johnson but although Tony lost the fight, this was way back in 2012 he now has amassed a stellar 10 fight win streak in the LW division against very tough guys. Granted some are no names but he still has better wins than Khabib...
They also have a few common opponents which tony beat in more dominant fashion.., finishing rather than taking to a UD
So, not hating on Khabib or riding Tony's nuts, not a fan of either really but know how good they are, just the question remainds
Why was Khabib ranked above Tony?
Like I said I'm not trying to make a point or anything I just really would like to hear a thought out and logical response from somebody that can explain it well enough.