IBF strips GGG *confirmed*

except he gave it up when he gave up his title to fight at 154 and not face GGG as a mandatory
He vacated his alphabet belt. He never lost the lineal title in the ring and Golovkin never won it.
 
I think its fair game. People complained when Golovkin wasn't getting the big fights, why does he get to not fight his mandatory opponents?
You whiners were crying about him only fighting mandatories not too long ago.
 
He vacated his alphabet belt. He never lost the lineal title in the ring and Golovkin never won it.
why don't you check the lineal title history. and you can't use Ring magazine as a source because Oscar owns it
 
You whiners were crying about him only fighting mandatories not too long ago.
I don't remember saying that but if I did, why is everyone suddenly on the opposite side of the argument?
 
You whiners were crying about him only fighting mandatories not too long ago.
Lol at trying to flip the script

maxresdefault.jpg
 
why don't you check the lineal title history. and you can't use Ring magazine as a source because Oscar owns it
Goes at least as far back as Hopkins to Canelo in a direct line of reigns won and lost in the ring.

Hopkins-Taylor-Pavlik-Sergio-Cotto-Canelo.
 
Back
Top