- Joined
- Dec 2, 2010
- Messages
- 12,863
- Reaction score
- 0
That makes Derevyanchenko the lineal Champexcept he gave it up when he gave up his title to fight at 154 and not face GGG as a mandatory
That makes Derevyanchenko the lineal Champexcept he gave it up when he gave up his title to fight at 154 and not face GGG as a mandatory
He vacated his alphabet belt. He never lost the lineal title in the ring and Golovkin never won it.except he gave it up when he gave up his title to fight at 154 and not face GGG as a mandatory
You whiners were crying about him only fighting mandatories not too long ago.I think its fair game. People complained when Golovkin wasn't getting the big fights, why does he get to not fight his mandatory opponents?
why don't you check the lineal title history. and you can't use Ring magazine as a source because Oscar owns itHe vacated his alphabet belt. He never lost the lineal title in the ring and Golovkin never won it.
I don't remember saying that but if I did, why is everyone suddenly on the opposite side of the argument?You whiners were crying about him only fighting mandatories not too long ago.
Lol at trying to flip the scriptYou whiners were crying about him only fighting mandatories not too long ago.
NopeThat makes Derevyanchenko the lineal Champ
Just to point out that you are.I don't remember saying that but if I did, why is everyone suddenly on the opposite side of the argument?
Dude was ducked , no one wants to fight him #AllTheBeltsNope
Goes at least as far back as Hopkins to Canelo in a direct line of reigns won and lost in the ring.why don't you check the lineal title history. and you can't use Ring magazine as a source because Oscar owns it