- Joined
- May 29, 2013
- Messages
- 21,005
- Reaction score
- 2
Khan is an Islamist, defender of terrorists and terrorist sympathizer. The other stuff is irrelevant.
He's an Islamist scumbag who is in charge of the city which is the historic home of modern western civilization. That's the real issue.
Edit: wrong yt vid
Thank you for the correct youtube video; I couldn't get the first one loud enough for me to understand it and it was driving me crazy. Except for "shared a platform", which could mean anything, it sounds like everything you're condemning him for is simply him doing his job as a defense attorney. Is this correct?