Immigrants voting against the native population = Audacious?

[caxias]

Instead of crying like a bitch, give me 1 example of a first world country with a majority-minority racial structure.

That's all you need to refute me.

 

[LEGS MAHONEY]

Instead of crying like a bitch, give me 1 example of a first world country with a majority-minority racial structure.

That's all you need to refute me.

I think the fact you see communism and the drug trade as small potatoes mean you need to sit this one out

 

[Trotsky]

I can't believe this discussion is still going.

If you can vote, that means you're a legal citizen. You're not an immigrant, legally speaking, at that point. You are every bit the citizen as anyone else. The fact that TS thinks that the fact that his parents immigrated generations before somehow makes him electorally superior is a damn good example of ingrained and unknowing white entitlement. Funnier still, the people making these arguments are usually considerably less productive and worthwhile citizens than the immigrants who they are decrying.

 

[nac386]

And this is why people say you're racist.

You ignore immigration statistics.

You ignore the fact George W Bush got 44% of the Hispanic vote.

You ignore that California had Republican immigrant Governor.

You keep posting demographics and pretending that it's immigration.

So we can conclude that you are

A. Stupid
B. Willfully ignorant (aka stupid)
C. Racist

There is no mass immigration in the US. You can post demographic trends in the US all you want but that's not immigration.

There are several obviously racist posters here, that also happen to be stupid (unsurprisingly).

 

[evansusmc2]

I don't believe your ignorance is an act. I'm sure it is quite real. Merry Christmas John J.

I actually meant YOU acting ignorant. Didn’t think I had to specify since it was so obvious. Enjoy your holidays princess.

 

[KILL KILL]

Amazed this stupid thread is still going.

 

[nixkid]

The vast majority of white people voted for Trump/Republican.

The vast majority of Hispanics voted for Democrats ...

This is a simple fact. But go ahead and pretend you don't know what I'm talking about

So only white people can be natives which means that a black person whose American ancestry dates back to before America existed is not a native. But some white guy whose great-grandfather got off a boat 100 years ago is native.

 

[Rod1]

There's always a lame excuse.

Not a majority-minority country.
White and non-indigenous 88.9%, Mapuche 9.1%, Aymara 0.7%, other indigenous groups 1% (includes Rapa Nui, Likan Antai, Quechua, Colla, Diaguita, Kawesqar, Yagan or Yamana), unspecified 0.3% (2012 est.) (source The World Factbook/CIA).

Argentina has a higher HDI than all LatAm countries, except Chile (and chile has a white majority).

Chile definitively doesnt has a white majority country, its a mixed majority country.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7472

Which proves my point Chileans dont consider themselves divided because they are all mixed to a point where one race was absorbed into another.

You also ignore the shitload of homogeneous countries in Africa, Asia and Europe that are "shitholes".

 

[justblaze717]

I can't believe this discussion is still going.

If you can vote, that means you're a legal citizen. You're not an immigrant, legally speaking, at that point. You are every bit the citizen as anyone else. The fact that TS thinks that the fact that his parents immigrated generations before somehow makes him electorally superior is a damn good example of ingrained and unknowing white entitlement. Funnier still, the people making these arguments are usually considerably less productive and worthwhile citizens than the immigrants who they are decrying.

TS isnt even American lol

 

[Rod1]

There's always a lame excuse.

Not a majority-minority country.
White and non-indigenous 88.9%, Mapuche 9.1%, Aymara 0.7%, other indigenous groups 1% (includes Rapa Nui, Likan Antai, Quechua, Colla, Diaguita, Kawesqar, Yagan or Yamana), unspecified 0.3% (2012 est.) (source The World Factbook/CIA).

Argentina has a higher HDI than all LatAm countries, except Chile (and chile has a white majority).

Argentina has a high HDI because it has a shitload of natural resources and little population.

And yet they continuously find themselves broke.

 

[weed]

TS isnt even American lol

that's what makes this all so sad

 

[Bald1]

This thread could have been so much better if the convo stayed away from race/color. How to keep the host nations culture and values intact in the face of mass migration is something worth discussing imo.

 

[caxias]

Chile definitively doesnt has a white majority country, its a mixed majority country.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7472

Which proves my point Chileans dont consider themselves divided because they are all mixed to a point where one race was absorbed into another.

so what? genetically Argentina's population is not 80% white/european (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19680675). You are using contradictory criteria. If argentina is 80% "white", then Chile is also a white country since most of them classify themselves as white.

Chile: Ethnic groups:

: white and non-indigenous 88.9%, Mapuche 9.1%, Aymara 0.7%, other indigenous groups 1% (includes Rapa Nui, Likan Antai, Quechua, Colla, Diaguita, Kawesqar, Yagan or Yamana), unspecified 0.3% (2012 est.)
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ci.html

You also ignore the shitload of homogeneous countries in Africa, Asia and Europe that are "shitholes".

​

The world's most and least ethnically diverse countries (2002 paper for the Harvard Institute of Economic Research):

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/

- Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. The most ethnically diverse countries tend to be poor and unstable.
- African countries are the most diverse. The world's Top 20 most diverse countries are African nations.
- All majority-minority nations are 3rd world countries.

 

[Rod1]

so what? genetically Argentina's population is not 80% white/european (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19680675). You are using contradictory criteria. If argentina is 80% "white", then Chile is also a white country since most of them classify themselves as white.

Chile: Ethnic groups:

: white and non-indigenous 88.9%, Mapuche 9.1%, Aymara 0.7%, other indigenous groups 1% (includes Rapa Nui, Likan Antai, Quechua, Colla, Diaguita, Kawesqar, Yagan or Yamana), unspecified 0.3% (2012 est.)
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ci.html​

Uruguay then.

Also you are proving my point with Chile the fact that mixed people and white people dont see themselves as different in Chile is in favor of integration not segregation.

- Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. The most ethnically diverse countries tend to be poor and unstable.
- African countries are the most diverse. The world's Top 20 most diverse countries are African nations.
- All majority-minority nations are 3rd world countries.

???

When did i argued against that? You said racial diversity is what caused chaos. Now you moved it into linguistic, religious and ethnic diversity, which is something i never argued against.

 

[Philo-Publius]

So, you have decided to leave your country (Mexico) and move to another country (the USA) in search of a better life. But, then you vote against the wishes of the native population.

The vast majority of non-hispanic white people voted for Republican and for Trump, yet the vast majority of hispanic people vote for Democrats. Does anyone else not find this absolutely audacious? and cheeky??

Why would you leave your country and move to another, only to want to change it against the wishes of the native population??

I am from England, I am an immigrant and I live in Japan now. I love Japan and don't want it to change ... I would literally vote for the conservative party here (if I was eligible). I came here because I love this country.

I don't understand at all why you would migrate to a country and want to change it to your way. I find it downright f**king audacious. I see these minority students burning effergies of Trump and protesting Trump, I just think they should just f**k off, frankly.

It would be like me migrating to Japan and demanding that they change for me and I start protesting their traditions and political system ... it would make me an asshole ... yet, all of these minority leftists in the UK/USA seem to get away with it.

I think a lot of countries in the west are sewing the seeds for civil strife with their open immigration policy. Not all immigrants, but the majority that vote against the wishes of the natives.

The phenomena of minority immigrants voting against the native population ... I just find it pretty audacious.

It's just another form of conquest. I am elated that Trump is strong on the border, and I hope he does more to maintain border security in the long term. No patriotic American with sense wants their country turned into a socialist shit pile.

 

[caxias]

Chile has a white majority according to chilean themselves. They are not a majority-minority country.

 

[Viva]

Audacious is putting it lightly.

In all honesty, its subtle usurpation by invaders who neither respect our people or our culture. Of course, there are always outliers, but a large portion of these people want to immigrate while bringing over their own cultures to replace our own. Often times they aren't really interested in integrating, but rather reaping the benefits of the society and maintaining their own homogeneous sects.

Its shocking this isn't more obvious to some, but I suppose ignorance is bliss when we're referring to specifically European/American cultural dismantling.

 

[Viva]

This thread could have been so much better if the convo stayed away from race/color. How to keep the host nations culture and values intact in the face of mass migration is something worth discussing imo.

Its naive to leave race out of the conversation, as it is inherently the issue with these sorts of problems.