- Joined
- Feb 16, 2018
- Messages
- 3,977
- Reaction score
- 0
This couldn't be more accurate. Post modern feminists like Trudeau and their feminist economic agendas have been categorically rejected by Asia because they value efficiency and industriousness. While the west sandbags their economies with silly theories the far east is doing exactly what they need to do in order to surpass us in economic power.
It's all very obvious and its nauseating to see it overlooked.
Chinese are worthy to become master race and takeover world. The west is stupid and weak.
I see these liberals in here. Lol if that is wests future.
Globalism overlays itself over top of general capitalism or communist regimes. The consolidation of all nations into one economic system. The world as a organized sandbox.
Currently China is still nationalist in behavior, but the economic tethers are being tied.
I do think there’s something to be said for Westernized culture/society deteriorating under the weight of ‘diversity’ on a long enough timeline if there aren’t periods of nationalism worked in. Especially when operating and competing directly against a country/economy that’s steeped in it (nationalism).
But there are pitfalls to overdoing nationalism for long periods of time too. Without diversity your innovation can grow stagnant overtime and possibly reverse course. After all, the OP (for example) does point out that a country with diversity is largely responsible for propping up the country influenced by nationalism.
There needs to be a balance.
China isn't a communist country.
Lol at you think need diverilsity
Interesting how the goal posts keep getting pushed back on this. 20 years ago China was now supposed to have surpassed us. Now? ‘20 more years!’
Anyway, even if and when it happens.. we’ll be 2nd? I’m not sure I get the paranoia over all this tbh, and I actually work in the manufacturing industry lol. I think we’ll be fine, adjustments can be made and a lot can happen in another 20+ years or so.
Eventually, you will be 4th behind the EU, China, and India I think.
Also, India probably takes longer. But eventually, those 3 will have a much higher population than the US.
That is of course only if the EU keeps growing to the east which it looks like it does and China doesn't collapse when the communist regime does.
And there is also the ASEAN region who will have like 800 million people in a decade or two. They already have 650 million or so.
It is really just a numbers game. At some point, those regions are going to catch up.
Without diversity your innovation can grow stagnant overtime and possibly reverse course. After all, the OP (for example) does point out that a country with diversity is largely responsible for propping up the country influenced by nationalism.
There needs to be a balance.
Eventually, you will be 4th behind the EU, China, and India I think.
Also, India probably takes longer. But eventually, those 3 will have a much higher population than the US.
That is of course only if the EU keeps growing to the east which it looks like it does and China doesn't collapse when the communist regime does.
And there is also the ASEAN region who will have like 800 million people in a decade or two. They already have 650 million or so.
It is really just a numbers game. At some point, those regions are going to catch up.
Like I said, a lot can happen in 20 years. But I’m not too worried about it atm. The US economy is very diverse and based in a huge country with a lot of people and a large amount of landmass on its own. 1 of our states alone (California) has one of the largest economies in the world.
Everything else we’re talking about is nothing more than projection, and that’s been wrong countless amounts of time.
But we’ll see.